FOUNDATIONS OF GERONTOLOGY AND AGING
A Self-Study Course
by Roger Hiemstra, PhD1
INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS
Course Description and Rationale
Areas of Learning
Competency Expectations
Textbook Suggestions
Suggested Self-Study Activities
LEARNING ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIVE MATERIALS
Learning Activity #1 - Learning Contract
Design
Learning Activity #2 – Readings
Learning Activity #3 – Developing A Personal
Philosophy Statement
Learning Activity #4 – Analyze and Agency
that Serves Older Adult Learners
Learning Activity #5 – Understand More About
Older Adults as Learners
Term Project Alternatives
MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL
McClusky's
Power-Load-Margin
Aging and Learning
Older Women's Ways of Learning
Four
Case Reports
Dear
Diary: A Learning Tool for Adults
REFERENCES, BLIOGRAPHY, AND READING SUGGESTIONS
INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS
Course
Description and Rationale
One of the most rapidly developing areas within
education is educational gerontology, the study and practice of education for
and about older adults. Peterson (1983) identified three major components of
educational gerontology -- education about aging, education for the aging, and
education for people who work with the aging.
In the more than three decades since Peterson wrote
his award winning book, the number of elderly and retired in the United States
has increased dramatically. In addition, there has been a tremendous growth in
numbers of elderly participating in learning activities. Coinciding with this
growth has been an increasing amount of research on older adults as learners.
Just as an example, Adult Education
Quarterly, Adult Learning, Educational Gerontology, the Gerontologist, the
International Journal of Aging and Human Behavior, and the Journal of Gerontology are only some of
the journals in the United States that regularly report on such research or
related implications.
Some of this inquiry has focused on psychological
and physiological problems adults face as they age, how information is
processed, short and long term memory, types of intelligence, and the
implications for learning or providing educational programs. Other research
areas have included cognitive styles, learning to learn, learning needs and
activities of older people, and life satisfaction.
In view of the above, this self-study effort's
general purpose is to facilitate learners exploring some of the ways in which
educators or trainers of adults can help many individuals to realize the
potential of the later years. Through a variety of experiences, you will have
an opportunity to develop new knowledge, skills, and attitudes relative to
education and aging. Prior background in gerontology, while helpful, is not
necessary since it will be possible to begin developing such a foundation
throughout the learning effort.
Areas for Learning
The following topic
areas suggest the range of content possible for in-depth personal study. There
are many additional topics that may emerge based on your experience, need, and
interests.
The
scope of educational gerontology
Processes of aging
Philosophy of working with the elderly
Educational
programming for the aging person
Methods
and techniques for teaching older adults
Older
adults as learners
Types of
older adult learning needs
Developing policy for older adult learners
Retirement/pre-retirement
education
Delivery
services, approaches and programs in educational gerontology
Professional and media interest in aging
The
theory of margin
Future
trends and predictions
Competency Expectations
At the completion of this self-study effort, given active
participation, you should be able to perform with excellence in the following
ways:
1. To understand
the scope of educational gerontology.
2. To be able to
express a personal philosophy about aging and the role of education or training
as it relates to the older adult.
3. To develop a
familiarity with the literature on research, theory, and practice in
educational gerontology.
4. To become aware
of problems, processes, and potentials of aging, especially as they pertain to
older learners.
5. To develop
skills needed for educational programming with older adults.
6. To become
familiar with various methods and techniques that facilitates older adult
learning.
7. To become
familiar with the various kinds of agencies and organizations that facilitates
older adult learning.
8. To understand
some of the current policy and policy needs pertaining to older adults as
learners.
9. To be able to
identify trends, future needs, and corresponding programming needs pertaining
to older adult learning.
Textbook Suggestions
There are three suggestions (seek them in a nearby
library, bookstore, or via the Internet):
1. Peterson, D.
A. (1983). Facilitating education for
older learners. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
2. Karasik, R. J., & Kruger, T. M. (2017). A hands-on approach to teaching about aging:
32 activities for the classroom and beyond. New York, NY: Springer
Publishing Co.
3. Ferraro, K,
& George, L. (2015). Handbook of
aging and the social sciences (8th Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Academic
Press.
In addition, various online readings can be found in
the following:
4. Hiemstra, R. (2005). Educational gerontology,
gerotontology, aging-related information. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from
http://www-distance.syr.edu/agingsite.html
Suggested Self-Study Activities
1. Learning Activity #l - Learning
Contract Design
Complete a self-diagnosis of needs relevant to this
self-study area, design a learning contract (or plan) for meeting many of those
needs, and carry out the planned activities.
Objective: To
facilitate your ability to diagnose, articulate, and meet individual learning
needs.
2. Learning Activity #2 - Readings
Complete those readings necessary to introduce you
to basic information on older adult learning. The bibliography in this document, those
bibliographies in the suggested texts, the suggested online readings, and your
own literature searching activity should be the primary means or sources for
obtaining this knowledge base. At a minimum to maximize what you obtain from
this self-study effort, you should include at least one of the suggested
textbooks, several articles from one or more journals central to the field, and
some familiarity with at least eight of the sources listed in this document’s
bibliography, the suggested online readings, or general educational gerontology
sources that you can locate. (The development of a personal interactive
reading log or some similar recording activity are common synthesizing tools).
Objective: To
facilitate your acquisition of a broad-based comprehension of related
literature and
knowledge pertaining to older adults as learners.
3. Learning Activity #3 - Develop a
Personal Philosophy Statement
Develop a personal
statement of educational philosophy and professional style relative to working
with older adults as learners. This could involve participating in some study
efforts related to educational philosophies described later in this guide and
then developing a statement that makes sense given requirements or constraints
within your place of work, your own personality, and the ways you have
developed for working with older adult learners. The product could be a 2-3
page paper in which you discuss your findings and conclusions in relation to
the course readings and subsequent discussions. This could be then shared with
friends, colleagues, etc. and you ask them for feedback as a way of reinforcing
your learnings.
Objective: To facilitate your study of different
philosophies related to working with older learners so that a personal
statement of educational philosophy can be developed and described to others.
4. Learning Activity #4 - Analyze An Agency that
Serves Older Adult Learners
Conduct a site visit
and some
agency, organization, or group in your local community that serves older
adults. Interview one or more staff members, talk with older participants if
possible, and review any available documentation. (Alternatively, if it is
impossible to actually visit an agency then it is feasible to obtain
appropriate information through correspondence, phone calls, search various
data bases, etc.) . The product could be a 3-5 page paper in
which you describe the agency and what you have learned regarding its adult
education activities. This could be then shared with friends,
colleagues, etc. and you ask them for feedback as a way of reinforcing your
learnings.
Objective: To
facilitate your initial understanding of at least one agency
associated with or delivering programs to older adult learners.
5. Learning Activity #5 - Understand More About
Older Adults As Learners
Interview two or more older people to gain further
insights into the learning process as experienced by older adults. These
interviews can be with elderly relatives, friends, or acquaintances (or people
picked at random if you so desire). The setting can be in a home, institution,
or other appropriate place. Determine what you can about what they learn, how
they learn, why they learn, etc. The product
could be a 3-5 page paper in which you discuss your findings and conclusions in
relation to the course readings and subsequent discussions. This could be then
shared with friends, colleagues, etc. and you ask them for feedback as a way of
reinforcing your learnings.
Objective: To facilitate your understanding of older adults as
learners.
6. Major
Learning Project (choose one of the following - the result typically will
be a 5-25 page paper or product)
a. Complete an
extensive paper on some topic related to the course content such as an
elaboration, discussion, and/or analysis of some aspect of older adult
learning.
b. Acquaint
yourself with the literature related to educational gerontology and older adult
learning by carrying out some reading activity that goes beyond that described in #2 above. This would include reading of a fairly broad, overview
nature and would result in an interactive reading log, diary, journal, theory
log, etc.
c. Plan and, if
possible, conduct a research study related to older adult learning, motivation,
and/or development -- or -- write a journal article related in some way to
older adult learning, motivation, development, etc.
d. Plan (and implement, if possible) an educational
program for older adult learners or design a training module related in to some
aspect of aging and older adult learning.
e. Write your own personal life history or assist an
older person in writing a personal life history including reflections on the
corresponding learning processes that were involved.
f. Negotiate some
activity of your own choosing as a means of acquiring some in-depth about the
foundations of gerontology in education.
[Suggestions on the
nature of a final product are described later in this document.]
Objectives: (1) To
facilitate your carrying out in-depth study, acquisition, and comprehension of
knowledge related to some course content area.
(2) To enhance your analytical skills in
comparing, contrasting, and critically reflecting on various sources of
information.
LEARNING ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIVE MATERIALS
LEARNING ACTIVITY #1 - LEARNING CONTRACT DESIGN
A. Read through the material on learning
contracts contained and/or referenced in this workbook (see Supplement A).
B. Determine personal learning needs (see
Supplement B) as a means of determining where to concentrate some of your study
efforts. Identify appropriate learning objectives, strategies, and resources,
and design corresponding validation procedures.
C. Review examples of contract forms and
completed contracts (as displayed in Supplements C-F) and/or talk with
colleagues experienced in contracting to obtain an understanding of their
value, nature, and form.
II. Presentation
A. Prepare a first version of your contract as
a personal guide to learning and share it with one or more friends and/or work
colleagues to obtain their feedback.
B. After receiving feedback revise, if needed,
and utilize this final document as a guide for your learning efforts.
III. Educational Goals
A. That you are able to diagnose, articulate,
and meet individual learning needs.
B. That you obtain experience in utilizing
learning contracts to guide your individualized, self-directed learning.
IV. Miscellaneous
A. Learning contracts may take on any form that
makes personal sense and that describes individual learning plans.
B. Learning contracts are only initial guides
and may be redesigned from time to time if your interests and/or goals change.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT A - LEARNING CONTRACTS
INTRODUCTION
The
use of learning contracts with adult learners has gained cogency during the
past three decades. Research on self-directed learning has resulted in the
search for appropriate learning resources and guides and a need by many
teachers of adults to provide some mechanism for learners to build on past
experience and determine needs as they carry out learning activities. Finally,
the emergence of non-traditional and online learning programs has mandated that
some vehicle be available for learners to mix experience with actual learning
endeavors. Thus, in response to these many needs the learning contract method
is increasing in its use for adult learning.
An
extended description of how to complete and utilize a learning contract is
shown below. A blank form is provided for you to use if the described format is
acceptable. In reality a learning contract can take on many shapes and forms
ranging from audiotapes, to outlines, to descriptive statements, to elaborate
explanations of process and product. The intent of utilizing learning contracts
is to provide a vehicle whereby you can personalize the learning experience.
Therefore, feel free to utilize whatever shape or form you develop or with
which you feel comfortable. For supplemental reading on contracts, the
following is recommended: http://roghiemstra.com/tlchap8.html.
LEARNING
STYLE PREFERENCES
In
developing your learning contract, it may be useful if you have a sense of your
own learning and cognitive styles. As you begin to think about your learning
contract, you may not yet have a thorough understanding of your own learning
style. Thus, the following figure is provided as an initial tool to facilitate
the learner who has never filled out a learning contract in obtaining some
sense of what might be the best approach for this course.
Your Learning Style
Preference
Cognitive Style |
Self-Directed Learner |
Other-Directed Learner |
Learner Dependent |
I. Standard Contract with suggested structure
used as basic guide |
II. Standard contract using suggestions from
another person |
Learner Independent |
III. Create own contract in terms of content
and procedure |
IV. Develop own version of contract using
suggestions from another person |
Note that the range of possibilities is quite
extensive.
SOME GUIDELINES FOR THE
USE OF LEARNING CONTRACTS
Why Use Learning Contracts?
One
of the most significant findings from research about adult learning is the following:
When adults go about learning something naturally (as contrasted with being
taught something), they are highly self-directing. Evidence has accumulated,
too, that what adults learn on their own initiative they learn more deeply and
permanently than what they learn by being taught (Brockett & Hiemstra, 1991
– see http://roghiemstra.com/sdlindex.html).
Those
kinds of learning that are engaged in for purely personal development can perhaps
be planned and carried out completely by an individual on personal terms and
with only a loose structure. But those kinds of learning that have as their
purpose improving one's competence to perform on a job or in a profession must
take into account the need and expectations of organizations, professions, and
society. Learning contracts provide a means for negotiating reconciliation
between these external needs and expectations and the learner's internal need
and interests.
Furthermore,
in traditional education the learning activity is structured by the teacher and
the institution. The learner is told what objective to work toward, what
resources are to be used and how (and when) to use them, and how any
accomplishment of the objectives will be evaluated. This imposed structure
conflicts with the adult's deep psychological need to be self-directing and may
induce resistance, apathy, or withdrawal. Learning contracts provide a vehicle
for making the planning of learning experiences a mutual undertaking between a
learner and any helper, mentor, or teacher. By participating in the process of
diagnosing personal needs, deriving objectives, identifying resources, choosing
strategies, and evaluating accomplishments the learner develops a sense of
ownership of (and commitment to) the plan. Learning contracts also are a means
for making the learning objectives of any field or practical experience clear
and explicit for both learners and facilitators.
How do you develop a learning contract?
Step 1: Diagnose your learning needs. A learning need is the gap between where you are now and where you
want to be in regard to a particular set of competencies. You may already be
aware of certain learning needs as a result of a personal appraisal or the long
accumulation of evidence for yourself regarding any gaps between where you are
now and where you would like to be.
If
not (or even so), it might be worth your while to go through this process:
First, construct a model of the competencies required to perform excellently
the role (e.g., parent, teacher, civic leader, manager, consumer, professional
worker, etc.) about which you are concerned. There may be a competency model
already in existence that you can use as a thought-starter and checklist; many
professions are developing such models. If not, you can build your own, with
help from friends, colleagues, supervisors, and expert resource people.
A
competency can be thought of as the ability to do something at some level of
proficiency and is usually composed of some combination of knowledge,
understanding, skill, attitude, and values. For example, "ability to ride
a bicycle from my home to work to get in better physical shape" is a
competency that involves some knowledge of how a bicycle operates and the route
to work; an understanding of some of the dangers inherent in riding a bicycle;
skill in mounting, pedaling, steering, and stopping a bicycle; an attitude or
desire to ride a bicycle; and a valuing of the exercise it will yield. Ability
to ride a bicycle in cross-country racing would be a higher-level competency
that would require greater knowledge, understanding, skill, etc. It is useful
to produce a competency model even if it is crude and subjective because of the
clearer sense of direction it provides.
Having
constructed a competency model, your next task is to assess the gap between
where you are now and where the model says you should be in regard to each
competency. You can do this alone or with the help of people who have been
observing your performance. The chances are you will find that you have already
developed certain competencies to a level of excellence so that you can concentrate
on those you haven't mastered. An example of a competency model is contained in
Appendix A.
Step 2: Specify your learning
objectives. You’re now ready to begin with the first
learning contract (objectives) column. Each of the learning needs diagnosed in
Step 1 should be translated into a learning objective. Be sure your objectives
describe what you will learn, not what you will do. State them in terms that
are most meaningful to you--content acquisition, terminal behaviors, or
direction of growth.
Step 3: Specify learning resources and
strategies. When you have finished listing your objectives, move
over to the second column of the contract (resources and strategies) and
describe how you propose to go about accomplishing each objective. Identify the
resources (material and human) you plan to use in your various learning
experiences and the strategies (techniques, tools) you will employ in making
use of them. Here is an example:
Learning
Objective |
Learning
Resources and Strategies |
Improve my ability to organize my work efficiently so that I can
accomplish 20 percent more work in a day. |
1. Find books and articles in the library on how to organize your
work and manage time and read them. |
. |
2. Interview three executives on how they organize their work, then
observe them for one day each, noting their techniques. |
. |
3. Select the best techniques from each, plan a day's work, and have
a colleague observe me for a day, giving me feedback on my efficiency. |
Step 4: Specify
target dates for completion. After
completing the second column, move over to the third column (target completion
date). Put realistic dates, unless there are institutionally or other required
deadlines.
Step 5: Specify
evidence of accomplishment. Move to
the fourth column (evidence) and describe what evidence you will collect to
indicate the degree to which you have achieved each objective. Perhaps the
following examples of evidence for different types of objectives will stimulate
your thinking about what evidence you might accumulate:
Type of
Objective |
Examples
of Evidence |
Knowledge |
Reports
of knowledge acquired, as in essays, examinations, oral presentations,
audio-visual presentations; annotated bibliographies. |
Understanding |
Examples
of utilization of knowledge in solving problems, as in action projects,
research projects with conclusions and recommendation, plans for curriculum
change, etc. |
Skills |
Performance
exercises, videotaped performance, etc., with ratings by observers. |
Attitudes |
Attitudinal
rating scales; performance in real situations, role playing, simulation
games, critical incident cases, etc., with feedback from participants and/or
observers. |
Value |
Value
rating scales; performance in value clarification group, critical incident
cases, simulation exercises, etc., with feedback from participants and/or
observers. |
Step 6: Specify how the evidence will
be validated. After you have specified what evidence you will
gather for each objective in column four, move to column five (verification).
For each objective, first specify the criteria by which you propose the
evidence will be judged. The criteria will vary according to the type of
objective. For example, appropriate criteria for knowledge objectives might
include comprehensiveness, depth, precision, clarity, authentication,
usefulness, scholarliness, etc. For skill objectives more appropriate criteria
may be flexibility, precision, poise, speed, gracefulness, imaginativeness,
etc.
After
you have specified the criteria, indicate the means you propose for verifying
the evidence according to these criteria. For example, if you produce a paper,
who will you have read it and what are their qualifications? Will they express their judgments by rating
scales, descriptive reports, or evaluative memos? How will they communicate those judgments to
you? Perhaps they can use a memo or some
other written statement. If you attempt to improve a professional skill, is there
someone at work who can judge your accomplishments? An action helping to differentiate
"distinguished" from "adequate" performance in ethics is
the wisdom with which personal validators operate.
Step 7: Review your contract with
consultants. After you have completed the first draft of your
contract, you will find it useful to review it with two or three friends, your
supervisors, or other expert resource people to obtain their reaction and
suggestions. Here are some questions you might have them ask about the contract
to receive optimal benefit from their help:
·
Are the learning objectives
clear/understandable/realistic and describe what you propose to learn?
·
Can they think of other objectives you might
consider?
·
Do the learning strategies and resources seem
reasonable, appropriate, and efficient?
·
Can they think of other resources and strategies
you might consider?
·
Does the evidence seem relevant to the various
objectives and would it convince others?
·
Can they suggest other evidence you might
consider?
·
Are the criteria and means for validating the
evidence clear, relevant, and convincing?
·
Can they think of other ways to validate the
evidence that you might consider?
Revise
the contract as needed based on any feedback you received.
Step 8: Carry out the contract. You now simply do what the contract calls for. But keep in mind that
as you work on it you may find that your notions about what you want to learn
and how you want to learn changing. So don't hesitate to revise your contract
as you go along.
Step 9: Evaluation of your learning. When you have completed your contract you will want some assurance
that you have in fact learned what you set out to learn. Perhaps the simplest
way is to ask the consultants you used in Step 7 to examine your evidence and
validation data and provide you their judgment about adequacy. You also can use
self-evaluation, talk with one or more friends, and/or people with whom you
work and seek their input on your accomplishments.
APPENDIX A
DEVELOPING
COMPETENCY MODELS
One of the most
valuable techniques for discovering (and constantly rediscovering) learning
needs is the competency model. To build
a competency model, it is necessary to decide first of all what the competency
components are for successful or outstanding performance in a particular field
or activity. When this is done, the next step is to determine your own present
level of competence with regard to each of the competency components. Once this
has been accomplished, the gaps between your present level of attainment and
the required level become apparent. While this seems to be simple--and it
is--there can be quite an impact when we clearly identify our own learning
needs for the first time. The awareness
of the gap between "what I can do" and "what I want to be able
to do" produces a strong motivational pull to close the gap with all
deliberate speed.
An example of this
process can be demonstrated in looking at potential competency requirements for
a position such as that of a purchasing manager in an industrial corporation.
The required competencies might be the following:
Competence Factors*
1. Knowledge of the source of products,
materials, or services required for successful corporate operation.
2. Knowledge of purchasing techniques and
methods.
3. Familiarity with pricing structures,
discounts, allowances, and quantity price breaks.
4. Awareness of delivery schedules, alternate
shipping techniques, and transportation routes and methods.
5. Competence in lease/buy decision making and
the negotiation of specific performance and delivery contract.
Supervisory and Managerial
Skills
Utilizing competency models
in organizations can produce the following effects:
1. Self-diagnosis of training and development
need.
2. Self-directed planning of personal growth
progress leading to greater internal commitment.
3. Increased feelings of psychological success
rather than psychological failure.
4. Clarification of supervisor and subordinate
perceptions of attainment and competence.
5. Improved bonus and compensation planning.
6. An orientation toward a continuing cycle of
growth and development with a focus on forward progress rather than judgment.
___________________
*You will need to develop appropriate competency models for your
interest areas. For example, you might desire to become a successful trainer or
teacher of adults in some specialty area.
DIAGNOSTIC
FORM
Foundations of Gerontology and
Aging
Name
____________________________________________ Date
________________________
The diagnostic form is
designed to assist you in assessing your level of competence and need related
to possible content areas for personal study and for assisting in the
construction of a learning contract. The
information will help you identify and develop many of the professional
competencies required to be an effective teacher or trainer of adults.
For each potential
content area, check the most relevant column indicating a
"self-rating." This information should guide your personal emphasis
on learning activities and the development of a relevant learning contract.
To assist in the
decision regarding which column to check for each area, use the information
below. Make your best estimation of
current strengths and weaknesses. In
addition, add other content areas you believe will be of value in your study
efforts.
DK If you are uncertain regarding the relation
between the listed area and your current level of need or competence and you
would like or need to explore this relation further through discussion,
reading, independent study, etc.
LO If your current competence related to the
listed area is especially low, but could be raised toward a desired level
through specific learning experiences.
MD If your past experiences have provided part
of the desired competence and some learning experiences would develop the
remainder.
HI If your past experiences have substantially
developed the listed area.
After you have
completed your self-ratings, go back and numerically rank each "LO"
that you checked according to the level of importance you would attach to it.
Think of this in terms of the amount of time that you should allot to this
topic. This might help you in thinking about areas of concentration for your
term project or to give some focus to the areas on which you wish to obtain
in-depth knowledge.
Self-rate yourself on each content area by checking one of the
relevant columns at the right of the table
Potential Content Areas |
DK |
LO |
MED |
HI |
1. The
scope of educational gerontology and aging |
|
|
|
|
2.
Processes of aging |
|
|
|
|
3.
Educational programming with and for the older learner |
|
|
|
|
4. Older
adults as learners |
|
|
|
|
5. The
theory of margin (load/power concepts) |
|
|
|
|
6. Types
of older adult learning needs |
|
|
|
|
7.
Professional and media interest in aging |
|
|
|
|
8.
Developing policy for older adult learners |
|
|
|
|
9.
Retirement/preretirement education |
|
|
|
|
10.
Future trends/projections and aging |
|
|
|
|
11.
Methods and techniques for teaching older adults |
|
|
|
|
12.
Delivery services, approaches, and programs in educational gerontology |
|
|
|
|
13.
Technology and the older adult |
|
|
|
|
14. Other |
|
|
|
|
15. Other |
|
|
|
|
16. Other |
|
|
|
|
17. Other |
|
|
|
|
18. Other |
|
|
|
|
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT C
Learning Contract Form
Learner: Content Area:
What are you
going to learn (objectives) |
How are you
going to learn it (resources/strategies) |
Target date
for completion |
How are you
going to know that you learned it (evidence) |
How are you
going to prove you learned (verification) |
|
|
|
|
|
LEARNING ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT D
Simulation One
Learner: John Doe Course:
Foundations of Gerontology and Aging _
What are you going to learn (objectives) |
How are you going to learn it (resources/strategies) |
Target date for completion |
How are you going to know that you learned it
(evidence) |
How are you going to prove you learned (verification) |
Improve my ability to
participate in a learning experience |
Actively participate as a
learner |
At the end of 4 months |
Self-perceptions about my
participation as a learner |
Seek feedback from
colleagues |
|
|
|
|
|
Improve my general
under-standing of older adults as learners and the educational gerontology
field |
1. Actively participate in
studying the field’s theory and literature 2. Complete a learning
contract |
1. First draft by the end
of two weeks 2. At the end of 4 months |
1. Keep a log of my
learnings 2. A learning contract that
I am pleased with |
1. Ask my work colleagues
for feedback 2. All contract tasks
completed |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquire much more information
about education gerontology literature |
1. Read at least one of the
suggested texts, the workbook, other resources I
find, at least 10 journal articles related to educating adults 2. Develop a personal
reading log summarizing what I learn |
At the end of 4 months |
Complete an interactive
reading log (see the term project write-up) |
Ask some colleagues for
feedback |
Develop new understanding of
my own philosophy for working with older adults as learners Improve my understanding of
an agency that works with older adult learners (the local geriatric center) |
1. Participate in the study
of philosophy and read suggested material 2. Complete the Zinn
instrument on philosophy 3. Talk with colleagues
about my philosophy 1. Complete at least two
interviews of agency administrators 2. Observe residents and
obtain written materials |
1. During the first two
weeks 2. At the end of 4 months 3. Throughout my learning
experiences 1. During their first month
of my study efforts 2. At the end of 4 months |
Write a statement of
personal philosophy that represents both my own and my professional involvement
with older adult learners Write a paper that
summarizes my personal findings and describes some of the implications for
work with older people |
Ask several colleagues at
work for some feedback Ask my supervisor for some
feedback Ask several colleagues at
work and someone from the agency for some feedback on my efforts |
LEARNING ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT D
Simulation One - Page Two
Learner: Jane Smith Course:
Foundations of Gerontology and Aging
_
What are you going to learn (objectives) |
How are you going to learn it (resources/strategies) |
Target date for completion |
How are you going to know that you learned it
(evidence) |
How are you going to prove you learned (verification) |
Improve my understanding of
how, why, and what adults learn |
1.Interview 4 older adults
using the Allen Tough protocol 2. Analyze and compare the
learning involvement among 4 adults in a 5 page paper |
1. Through-out the first
half of my learning experience 2. At the end of 4 months |
Create some tables that
portray my findings, write a corresponding report, and share it with some
colleagues |
Ask my work colleagues for
feedback on my understanding and proposed implications |
|
|
|
|
|
Enhance my understanding of
older adults as learners, the educational gerontology field, and my potential
role in the field (term project) |
1. In addition to what is noted
in the third section of the previous page, read at least two more books
listed in the workbook bibliography or the equivalent to that in journal
articles, monographs, and Web sources I find 2. Annotate ideas,
reflections, and new learnings in a reading log |
At the end of 4 months |
Extensive reading log
(15-20 pages or more) where I will both summarize and interact with my
readings |
Ask my work colleagues for
feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEARNING ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT E
Simulation Two
Learner: Jane Smith Course:
Foundations of Gerontology and Aging _
What are you going to learn (objectives) |
How are you going to learn it (resources/strategies) |
Target date for completion |
How are you going to know that you learned it
(evidence) |
How are you going to prove you learned (verification) |
The objectives suggested in
the workbook for Learning Activities 1-6 |
Engage in the various
learning activities 3 - I will begin developing
a personal portfolio in lieu of a philosophy statement 4 – I will analyze my local
senior center 5 – I will do group
interviews of participants at the local Oasis Center to find out about their
learning efforts |
At the end of a 4 month
study effort |
Complete the products
suggested in the workbook for each activity |
Seek at least two family
members or work colleagues to provide me with feedback |
Term project: Increase my understanding
of the education and training of those who work with older adult learners |
1. Read at least the
material suggested in the workbook for gaining some expertise in this area of
study 2. Take notes on what I
learn |
At the end of a 4 month
study effort |
Develop a written report
that summarizes what I have learned |
I will carry out
self-assessment and also ask some colleagues for feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEARNING ACTIVITY #1: SUPPLEMENT F - LEARNING CONTRACT SIMULATION
THREE
AN ALTERNATIVE VERSION CREATED IN A
LINEAR FORMAT
Foundations
of Gerontology in Education Edwina Thomas
First
Draft of Learning Contract
L.A.
#2 - Readings. I plan to read at least two of the suggested texts. I also will
read other materials on the Web, in journal articles, etc. I will keep a log of
my various activities that I eventually include in a portfolio.
L.A.
#3 - Using the guidelines provided in the workbook, I will begin the process of
developing a professional statement of philosophy for my work in the health
field with older patients. I will provide a 2-3 page paper that summarizes my
philosophy but know that this will need to be an ongoing process. I will ask
some work colleagues to provide me with formal feedback.
L.A.
#4 – Using the guidelines in the workbook, I will analyze my own agency by
interviewing senior administrators, patients, and relatives of patients to
develop a true understanding of how we do in working with older people. I will
attempt to determine if there are related learning implications. I will put all
that I learn into a report that I can share with colleagues.
L.A.
#5 - As I am very interested in history, I will substitute a learning
experience that enables me to better understand how history has dealt with the
older adult and what are the potential implications for our medical facility. I
will develop the final product and publish it in our unit’s newsletter and on
the facility’s web page.
Term
Project - I will design a training program for all my colleagues at the
divisional level that takes what I learn and demonstrates how we can do a
better job of working with older adults and their relatives. I will carry out
this training program if my supervisor feels it will be a worthwhile activity.
At the very least, I will ask my work colleagues for feedback on my learning
and development efforts.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #2: READINGS
I.
Preparation
A.
Utilize as resource bases the bibliography in this resource, the
bibliographic citations in the suggested texts, the texts themselves, your own
literature searching activities, and the Internet based on personal interests
or needs.
B.
Complete those readings necessary to introduce you to the topics of
educational gerontology and older adults as learners. At a minimum, this reading effort should
include at least one of the suggested textbooks, several articles from one or
more journals central to the field, and some familiarity with at least eight
sources listed in this resource’s bibliography, or general educational
gerontology sources that you can locate.
II.
Presentation
A.
Develop an interactive reading log, theory log, personalized journal,
diary, or some similar recording device as a synthesizing tool for your
efforts (these tools are described later).
B.
Share the materials you create with a colleague and ask them for their
feedback on what you accomplished.
III. Educational Goals
A.
That you will acquire a broad-based comprehension of related literature.
B.
That you will become familiar with the different sources of information
to older adults as learners.
IV.
Miscellaneous
A.
The final product can take any form that makes sense to you. You can
even combine some of those recommended presentation forms show in IIA or
develop some technique on your own for portraying what you have learned.
B.
Discussing what you find with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #3: DEVELOPING A PERSONAL
PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT
I. Preparation
A. Read the material pertaining to philosophy and
personal style in this workbook (Supplement G) and/or any other related
materials that you can locate. In addition, examine the power point lecture
shown at http:/roghiemstra.com/philosophy.ppt
to obtain a working knowledge of various philosophical models. Finally,
complete the Zinn Philosophy of Adult
Education Inventory (Supplement H) to obtain knowledge of your own
philosophical preferences.
II. Presentation
A. That you will gain an awareness of various
philosophies and
their potential for guiding your current or future professional work with older
adults
B.
Discussing what you develop with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
LEARNING ACTIVITY #3:
SUPPLEMENT G
Table
1. Five Philosophies of Adult Education
(Developed by L. M. Zinn and Elias and Merriam, 1980).
Your Final Score |
L = |
B = |
P = |
H = |
R = |
. |
Liberal Adult Education (Classical, Traditional) |
Behaviorist Adult Education |
Progressive Adult Education |
Humanistic Adult Education |
Radical Adult Education (Reconstructionist) |
Purposes: |
To develop intellectual powers of the mind; to make a person
literate in the broadest sense—intellectually, morally, spiritually,
aesthetically |
To bring about behavior that will ensure survival of the human
species, societies, and individuals; To promote behavioral change |
To transmit cultural and society structure; to promote social
change; to give earners practical knowledge and problem-solving skills |
To enhance personal growth and development; to facilitate
self-actualization |
To bring about through education fundamental social, political, and
economic changes in society |
Learner(s): |
“Renaissance person;” cultured; always a learner; seeks knowledge
rather than just information; conceptual and theoretical understanding |
Learner takes an active role in learning, practicing new behavior
and receiving feedback: strong environmental influence |
Learner needs, interests, and experiences are key elements in
learning; people have unlimited potential to be developed through education |
Learner is highly motivated and self-directed; assumes
responsibility for own learning |
Equality with teacher in learning process; personal autonomy; people
create history and culture by combining reflection with action |
Teacher: |
The “expert,” transmitter of knowledge; authoritative; clearly
directs learning process |
Manager; controller; predicts and directs learning outcomes |
Organizer; guides learning through experiences that are educative;
stimulates, instigates, and evaluates learning process |
Facilitator; helper; partner; promotes but does not direct learning |
Coordinator; suggests but does not determine direction for learning;
equality between teacher and learner |
Concepts/Key Words: |
Liberal learning for its own sake; rational, intellectual education;
general education; traditional knowledge; classical humanism |
Stimulus-response; behavior modification; competency-based; mastery
learning; behavioral objectives, trial and error,; skill training; feedback;
reinforcement |
Problem-solving; experience-based education; democracy; lifelong
learning; pragmatic knowledge; needs assessment; social responsibility |
Experiential learning; freedom; individuality; self-directedness;
interactive; openness; authenticity; ambiguity; feelings |
Consciousness-raising; praxis; noncompulsory learning; autonomy;
social action; deinstitutionalization; literacy training |
Methods: |
Lecture; didactic; study groups; contemplation; critical reading and
discussion |
Programmed instruction; contract learning; teaching machines;
computer-assisted instruction; practice and reinforcement |
Problem-solving; scientific method; activity method; experimental
method; project method; inductive method |
Experiential; group tasks; group discussion; team teaching;
self-directed learning; individualized learning; discovery method |
Dialogue; problem-posing; maximum interaction; discussion groups |
People/Practices: |
Socrates, Aristotle, Adler, Kallen, Van Doren, Houle; Great Books; Lyceum; Chautauqua;
Elderhostel; Center for the Study of Liberal Education |
Skinner, Thorndike, Watson, Tyler; APL (Adult Performance Level);
competency based teacher education; behavioral modification programs |
Spencer, Dewey, Bergevin, Sheats, Lindeman, Benne, Blakely; ABE; ESL; citizenship
education; community schools; cooperative extension; schools without walls |
Rogers, Maslow, Knowles, May, Tough, McKenzie; encounter groups;
group dynamics; self-directed learning projects; human relations training; Esalen Institute |
Brameld,
Holt, Kozol, Freire, Goodman, Illich,
Ohliger; Freedom Schools; Friere’s
literacy training; free schools |
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4: ANALYZE AN AGENCY SERVING
OLDER ADULT LEARNERS
I.
Preparation
A.
Select at least one agency, organizations, or group in your community
that serves older adults, preferably in some educational manner (see Supplement
I for ideas on places to visit in any location).
B. Learn about the agency's (or each agency's)
operation and activities with reference to such factors as clientele served,
nature of the adult education programs, status of the staff, philosophical
rationale adhered to, constraints under which the agency operates, etc.
C. The agency should be one that you can visit
and carry out an on-site study (see Supplements J, K, L, and M for ideas on
what you might do or look for during a site visit). Alternatively,
if it is impossible to actually visit an agency then it is feasible to obtain
appropriate information through correspondence, phone calls, various electronic
data bases, library research, etc.
II.
Presentation
A.
Summarize your findings in a manner that makes sense to you.
B.
Derive a statement of personal reflection and assessment based on the
findings.
A.
That you will gain experience in analyzing an educational
agency that works with older adults, its
purposes, its programs, and its personnel.
B.
That you will become more familiar with an agency associated with
programs for older adult learners.
IV.
Miscellaneous
A.
Consider selecting an agency with which you are not familiar and/or
interested as it will make it more meaningful.
B.
Discussing what you develop with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4: SUPPLEMENT I
EDUCATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR OLDER ADULTS IN A TYPICAL COUNTY
Health Related
Home
Aides
Visiting Nurses Association
Caring
Coalition
Holistic Medicine Association
YMCA
(health & recreation)
YWCA
Red
Cross (CPR, etc.)
Hospitals Continuing Education Activities
County
Health Department
Basic Adult Education
ABE
Center
G.E.D. – Vocational/Technical Centers
Literacy Volunteers of America
Pro
Literacy
The
Learning Place or Learning Place East
Employment Needs
Career
Centers
State
Employment Office
Rehabilitation (Ability Associates)
Any
College's Career Counseling Program
Jobs
Training Centers
Professional Organizations and Associations
Business & Professional Women
A.I.A.
Occupational Therapists
American Society for Training and Development (ASTD)
Local
Adult and Continuing Education organizations
Senior Citizen Needs
Golden
Age Club
Retired Seniors Volunteer Program
Senior
Centers
Gerontology Centers
Adopt
A Grandparent Program
Elderhostel
AARP
Programs
Oasis
Centers
Coping Skills
Cooperative Extension
Planned Parenthood
Rape
Crisis centers
Computer Literacy programs
Elder
Abuse Projects
Displaced Homemakers programs
Alzheimer's Organization
Continuing Education
County
Libraries
County
public and private schools (not all will have continuing education program)
Continuing Education Division of a local Community College
Any
College's Continuing Education Programs
Other
Parent-Teacher Associations
Churches
Various Neighborhood Centers
County
Aging Organization
Conventions Centers
Alcoholics Anonymous
Catholic Charities
Cooperative Extension
Various
out of town colleges with extension programs
Continuing Medical Education for Doctors
Planned Parenthood
Churches/Religious Organizations
Rescue
Mission/Goodwill
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4 SUPPLEMENT J
AGENCY SITE
VISIT SUGGESTIONS
One
way to approach this learning activity would be to interview a staff member and
take a tour of the facility. If
possible, you may even be able to observe education in progress. Two questions should guide your inquiry: (a) What is distinctive about this agency?
(b) How does this agency work?
1. In
interviewing a staff member (an administrator or key teacher), you should
attempt to identify the following:
× the agency's mission and goals
(why the program exists and what it hopes to accomplish)
× the educational content
(what is actually taught or what kind of programs are offered)
× the educational structure
(scheduling, mandatory versus voluntary attendance, etc.)
× staffing (size, credentials,
assignments)
× budget (amount, source,
stability from year to year)
× relationship to the larger
institution (if applicable)
[Some of this information will be available in
literature about the agency as well.]
2. Touring
the agency will give you a chance to see the facilities provided and to get a
feel for the atmosphere of the agency.
3. If you
can observe a class in session, you might talk to two or three adult learners
to discover why they are attending (what they hope to accomplish) and their
opinions about the program (degree of satisfaction, strengths, and weaknesses).
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4 SUPPLEMENT K - A CHECKLIST
FOR ANALYZING THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
[Adapted from Hiemstra and Sisco (1990) and Hiemstra (1991)]
Following is a checklist for analyzing aspects of
a learning environment; see if whether or not these concerns seem to exist.
SENSORY CONCERNS SEATING CONCERNS SOCIAL/CULTURAL CONCERNS
___ Adequate
lighting ___ Adjustable
seats or ___ Overt or subtle
gender
___ Absence of
glare alternative
choices discrimination
existing
___ Lighting
adequate for A/V ___ Adequate
cushioning if ___ Overt or
subtle age
devices used for long
periods discrimination
existing
___
Attractive/appropriate colors ___ Can
person's legs be ___ Overt or
subtle racial
and decorations crossed comfortably discrimination existing
___ Adequate
acoustics ___ Straight back
and flat ___ Facilitators
trained for age,
___ Adequate sound
amplification pan for people
with race, and gender
sensitivity
___ Any noise to
be reduced or back
problems ___ Sociopetal discussion/seating
eliminated ___ Adequate sturdiness/size relationships facilitated
___ Temperature
adequate for season ___ Easily moved
around ___ Knowledge of
various cultures
of the year ___ Seat height from
floor and associated histories
___ Adequate
ventilation or air
adequate
incorporated into learning
conditioning ___ Left handed learner ___ Women learners disempowered or
___
"Warm" or "caring" setting provided for devalued in any way
FURNISHINGS CONCERNS GENERAL CONCERNS PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCERNS
___ Adequate table
or writing space ___ Adequate
access/egress to ___ Learners
helped to become
___ Can furnishing
be rearranged site for
learners acquainted
with each other
for small group work or ___ Adequate signage to direct ___ Learners helped to feel at
sociopetal
needs learners to
appropriate ease and relaxed
___ Table space
available for sites ___ Special attention
given to the
refreshments/resources ___ Lavatory/cafeteria/refresh- very first encounter with
___ If sitting at
tables can the ment machines nearby learners
learners cross their legs ___ Adequate parking nearby ___ Barriers learners may face
___ If learners
sit at tables can ___ Adequate
lighting in parking addressed
by facilitators
they be arranged in a square, area and building hallways ___ Barriers learners may face
circle, or U-shape ___ Adequate space shape and addressed by administrators
___ Absence of
ragged or sharp size in
learning site ___ Learners
helped to take more
edges on all furnishings ___ Breakout rooms/areas control of own learning
___ Adequate
sturdiness for all available
if needed ___ Facilitators
trained in adult
furnishings ___ Does the learning site
have learning literature and
___ Can learners
see each other flexibility and
provide for theory
adequately when seated learner movement if needed ___ Facilitators trained in adult
___ Can learners
see facilitator ___ Learners facilitated
in using teaching techniques and
adequately when seated computer technology theory
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4 SUPPLEMENT L
POTENTIAL
LEARNING AIDS, RESOURCES, AND ACTIVITIES IN AN AGENCY
Following
are lists of potential learning aids, resources, and activities that can be
used to enhance adult learning activities. Analyze the agency in terms of
whether or not any of these seem to exist or are used in any way. This can be
through interviews, observations, reading of available documents, assessing of
learning resources used by the agency, etc. Add to it other aids, resources,
and activities the agency uses.
Mediated Resources
_____ Journals/Magazines _____ Television
_____ Programmed Learning _____
Radio
_____ Mp3 Material
_____ Learning Modules/Kits
_____ Computers _____ Films/Video Resources
_____ Workbooks _____ Conferencing Software
_____ Interactive Video _____
Elect. Networks/web pages
Individualized Resources
_____ Travel _____ Self Talk
_____ Competency Ratings _____
Learning Projects
_____ Gaming Devices _____
Personal Journals/Diaries
_____ Observations _____ Internships
_____ Personal Inventories _____
Stimulated Recall
Agency/Group Resources
_____ Classes _____ Inter-Agency Exchanges
_____ Free Universities _____
Conferences/Workshops
_____ Libraries _____ Museums/Galleries
_____ Proprietary Schools _____
Discussion Groups
Mentored Resources
_____ Peer Reviews _____ Learning Partners
_____ Modeling _____ Counseling/Testing
_____ Mentors _____ Information Counselors
_____ Personality Analyses _____
Networks/Networking
Other Resources You Can Identify
___________________________________________________
Adapted
from Hiemstra and Sisco, 1990, pp. 172-173.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #4 SUPPLEMENT M
AN
ORGANIZATIONAL AUDIT
An organizational audit is a procedure for examining
the educational practices, procedures, programs, and policies of an
agency. At a minimum this should include
four activities:
1.
Interviewing at least two people who work in the agency. One needs to be
a top administrator of either the total agency or of a particular unit being
examined. The second should be a person working to actually deliver services of
some sort to clients, students, or trainees, such as a program planner,
trainer, teacher, counselor, or coordinator. Additional people can be
interviewed depending on time, availability, and permission of agency
administrators.
2.
Observations within the agency, such as of on-going classes or programs,
media centers, resource centers, and library materials. It also should include an examination of learning
resource materials.
3. Acquiring
available literature, documents, and reports that describe the policies,
philosophy, and procedures of an agency or a particular unit being examined.
4. Touring
the facilities, including training centers, workshop sites, classrooms,
tutorial rooms, etc.
Additional activities that would seem appropriate to
help you acquire a good understanding of what the unit does in delivering
continuing education or training programs, courses, or resources can be
developed on site and with the support of agency administrators. For example,
although it is frequently difficult, interviews with learners or trainees or
past students sometimes can be quite informative. Reading evaluative reports from students and
others also can be useful if available.
The purpose of this particular audit is to obtain
information about existing programs or opportunities for older adult learners.
Your ultimate goal will be to produce a report of your findings.
To guide your information gathering efforts,
following are some ideas, interview questions (two options are provided), and
other tips. They are only suggestive,
however, of the many possibilities and you should feel free to derive your own
collection strategies and criteria.
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE A
1. Does your
agency engage in teaching classes for older adults, conducting continuing
education programs, or training people?
Yes No
If yes what type of classes, programs, and/or
training sessions are available?
What kinds of teaching methods or approaches are
used?
What kinds of audio/visual or technological teaching
devices are used?
2. Are there
people in your agency responsible for the development of programs which provide
learning experiences for older adults, other than direct teaching?
Yes No
If yes, what is the nature of these
responsibilities?
3. Are there
people in your agency who supervise and/or conduct programs, other than direct teaching,
which provide learning experiences for older adults?
Yes No
If so, what is the nature of their duties?
4. Do you
have a program for counseling older adults or adult groups either on a personal
basis or through testing services which you offer?
Yes No
If yes, what is the nature of this counseling or
testing service?
5. Are there
people in your agency who are responsible for the development of curriculum
materials for classroom or non-classroom learning?
Yes No
If so, what are these learning experiences and what
is the nature of the materials?
What kinds of self-directed, individualized learning
opportunities are available?
What kinds of self-directed, individualized learning
resources are available?
6. Are there
people in your agency who are responsible for coordinating and publicizing
non-classroom or classroom teaching or training programs?
Yes
No
If so, please describe these coordinating and
publicizing efforts.
7. Are there
people in your agency who are primarily responsible for evaluating the
effectiveness of older adult learning programs?
Yes No
If yes, please describe their jobs and/or their
evaluation efforts?
8. Are your
programs financed by outside sources or are they self-supporting?
Outside Self-supporting
Please describe the financial support arrangements.
What other resources (materials, buildings, etc.)
does your agency use for older adult learning and how are they acquired?
9. Are there
constraints or problems limiting the types and/or amounts of educational
programs your agency can provide?
Yes No
If yes, please describe them.
10. Derive additional questions to help you obtain
necessary information about learning opportunities, resources, or constraints
in the agency?
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE B
Purpose-Objectives
What are the goals, purposes, and objectives of the
agency relative to older adult teaching, training, or learning?
Are they stated anywhere, can employees read them,
and, if available, can I obtain a copy?
Have the purposes changed through the years and, if
so, how?
Is the agency affiliated with local, state, or
national associations relative to older adult learning/training?
What is the nature of the clientele served with these
older adult learning/training programs?
Older Adult Learning/Training
Organization and Administration
Who determines what shall be offered?
How are new programs initiated?
Where does the staff look for program/training
ideas?
Is there a stated program/training philosophy? Is it stated anywhere? Can employees read the information, and, if
available, can I obtain a copy?
Are there self-directed, individualized learning opportunities,
options, or resources available?
What is the organizational structure of the
agency? How do training/continuing
education staff fit within this structure?
Who are the supportive staff? What is the nature of their roles?
How often are staff meetings held to discuss
training/continuing education issues and programs? What is the nature of these meetings?
What is the professional training of the staff
involved with training/continuing education?
Are there planned in-service training programs for
training/ continuing education staff?
What is the nature of such training?
How are training/continuing education programs
promoted?
How are instructors/trainers chosen?
How are they trained?
What are the constraints to program administration?
Finances
Self-support?
Partial subsidy? Complete
subsidy? Other?
Are fees charged?
On what basis?
Can one register for educational programs by
mail?
Is there a charge for older adult counseling and
testing?
How much are instructors paid and how are the paid?
Is there a refund policy?
Evaluation
What types of evaluation are used by instructors?
What types of evaluation are made by students and
how is this information used?
How are the training/continuing education programs
or opportunities evaluated?
What kinds of improvements are contemplated and how
are they to be implemented?
Derive additional questions to help you obtain
necessary information about learning opportunities, resources, or constraints
in the agency?
I.
Preparation
A.
Familiarize yourself with the learning projects interview procedure developed by
Tough, the interview questions displayed in Supplement N, the
interview questions shown on http://roghiemstra.com/contemp.html,
or some other interviewing techniques that you could use to find out about
another person's learning endeavors or experiences.
B.
Become familiar with one or more of the following sources if at all
possible: Brockett and Hiemstra (1991);
Candy, (1991); Tough (1971).
II. Presentation
A.
Complete an interview of at least two older adults (more if possible) to
determine what you can about their learning activities during the past year.
B.
Obtain information relative to their learning activities, learning
interests, self-directed learning preferences, etc.
C.
Summarize your findings in a manner similar to how other learning
projects information has been reported (see Supplement O) or in some other
manner that makes sense to you.
D.
Derive a statement of personal reflection and assessment based on the
findings. This could be a 3-5 page paper or report of this information that you
share with one or more colleagues and seek their feedback.
III. Educational Goals
A.
That you will improve your understanding of older adults as learners.
B.
That you will be able derive some personal reflections on the
implications of your findings.
IV.
Miscellaneous
A.
Remember to keep this activity very informal, as the intent is to help
you obtain a greater appreciation for the field educational gerontology and
older adults as learners.
B.
Discussing what you develop with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #5: SUPPLEMENT N
INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS - A
Interviews
with adult learners will provide you with an opportunity to apply the
information from class discussions and your readings to the "real
world." You might decide to do in-depth interviews as Tough used to
uncover information on adults' learning projects (see Interview Suggestions B),
or you may wish to use the suggestions below to guide your questioning.
Suggested topics:
1. Reasons
for learning - Why do you learn? What motivates you to learn? Is your
motivation to learn now the same as it was 5, 10, 15, or 20 years ago?
2. Areas
of learning - What do you want to learn? If your "basic" leaning
needs were met, and there were no constraints, what would you want to learn?
3. Amount
of learning - What have you learned during the past year? How many different
learning projects or activities have you undertaken? Approximately how many
hours have you spent in learning activities of all types during the past year?
4.
Preferred learning style - How do you learn? Do you learn most things
in the same way? Where do you prefer to learn? When do you prefer to learn?
5.
Self-directed learning preferences - What are your expectancies regarding
control of learning decisions? Do you consider yourself a self-directed learner?
6.
Barriers (situational, dispositional, institutional barriers) to
learning - What keeps you from learning?
7. Role of
past educational experiences - What are your memories of your early
education in school?
8. Role of others - How did your family view
education? Do any of your teachers at any level stand out in your mind?
9. Potential for change - What would you like to
change in relation to your own learning?
INTERVIEW
SUGGESTIONS - B
Hiemstra (1975),Appendix A, displays the interview schedule used for a study of older
adult learners using the Learning Projects research protocol for part of the
research project. To make direct comparisons with the tables shown in
Supplement O, use this schedule.
LEARNING
ACTIVITY #5: SUPPLEMENT O
SUPPORTIVE MATERIALS RELATED TO TOUGH’S LEARNING
PROJECTS RESEARCH
Table 1. Sources
Preferred by Adult Learners (by rank
and age)
[Adapted from various learning project studies]
Resources |
25-54 (N=775) |
55-78 (N=712) |
Books, articles, newspapers, etc. |
1 |
1 |
Expert |
2 |
6 |
Friend, relatives, peers |
3 |
5 |
Group, group instructor |
4 |
3 |
Personal experiences, observations |
5 |
2 |
TV, radio, recordings, films |
6 |
4 |
Travel |
7 |
9 |
Displays, exhibits, museums |
8 |
8 |
Programmed or self-study learning materials |
9 |
7 |
The following three tables are from Hiemstra (1975).
Table 2. Older Adults’
Learning Projects: General Informationa
Informational
Description |
Hours |
Projects |
Average Per Person |
324.56 |
3.33 |
Standard Deviation |
296.05 |
1.95 |
Median |
237.43 |
3.04 |
Range |
12-2300 |
1-9 |
aBased on 214
adults (average age = 68) with one or more learning projects.
Table 3. Number of
Learning Projects Conducted in One Year
Number of Projectsa |
Number of People |
Percent of Peopleb |
Accumulative Percent |
0 |
41 |
-- |
-- |
1 |
46 |
21.4 |
021.4 |
2 |
43 |
20.0 |
041.4 |
3 |
34 |
15.8 |
057.2 |
4 |
38 |
17.7 |
074.9 |
5 |
26 |
12.1 |
087.0 |
6 |
14 |
06.5 |
093.5 |
7 |
05 |
02.3 |
095.8 |
8 |
06 |
02.8 |
098.6 |
9 |
03 |
01.4 |
100.0 |
aSee Tough
(1979) for comparable data.
bBased on a base
of 214 individuals.
Table 4. Frequency of
Type of Primary Planner of Learning Projects
Primary Planner of Project |
No. With
At Least One Project |
Average
No. With Planner |
A group
or its Leader/Instructor |
086 |
1.69 |
One
Person in One-to-One Situation |
048 |
1.52 |
Material/Non-Human
Resource |
022 |
1.27 |
The
Learner Him or Herself |
183 |
2.14 |
Mixed (No
Dominant Type) |
046 |
1.57 |
Table 5. Learning
Projects: Supportive Information
Informational Description |
Number of
Projectsa |
Percent
of Projects |
Current Status of Project: |
-- |
-- |
Inactive |
176 |
24.79 |
Active |
534 |
75.21 |
Reason for Doing Project: |
-- |
-- |
To Obtain Credit |
027 |
03.84 |
For a Test or Examination |
009 |
01.28 |
For Job Improvement/Acquisition |
106 |
15.08 |
Enjoyment |
485 |
68.99 |
Mixed Reasons |
076 |
10.81 |
Primary Planner of Project: |
-- |
-- |
A Group or Its Leader/Instructor |
145 |
20.45 |
One Person in a One-to-One Situation |
073 |
10.30 |
Material/Non-Human Resource |
028 |
03.95 |
The Learner Him or Herself |
391 |
55.15 |
Mixed (No Dominant Planner Type) |
072 |
10.16 |
Subject Matter Area: |
-- |
-- |
Occupational/Vocational |
115 |
16.17 |
Personal/Family |
144 |
20.25 |
Social/Civic |
067 |
09.42 |
Self-Fulfillment |
385 |
54.15 |
Source of Subject Matter: |
-- |
-- |
Group/Group Instructor |
086 |
12.11 |
Expert |
032 |
04.51 |
Books/Pamphlets/Newspaper |
222 |
31.27 |
Programmed/Self-Study Materials |
020 |
02.82 |
TV/Radio/Recordings |
066 |
09.30 |
Displays/Exhibits/Museums/Galleries |
008 |
01.13 |
Friend/Colleague/Relative/Neighbor |
053 |
07.47 |
Mixed Source |
223 |
31.41 |
aProject totals for
each major category are not always equal because of occasional non-responses.
TERM PROJECT
ALTERNATIVES
I. Preparation (any one of the following
- 15 to 25 hours of total study, reflection, and sharing with others would be
expected as a means of achieving adequate proficiency)
A.
Complete an extensive paper on some topic related to the course content such
as an elaboration, discussion, and/or analysis of older adult learning.
B.
Acquaint yourself with the literature related to educational gerontology
and older adult learning by carrying out some reading activity that goes beyond
that described in #2 above. This would include reading of a fairly broad,
overview nature and would result in an interactive reading log, diary, journal,
etc. (see Supplements P, Q, and R).
C.
Plan and, if possible, conduct a research study related to older adult learning,
motivation and/or development – or—write a journal article related in some way
to older adult learning, motivation, development, etc.
D.
Plan (and implement, if possible) an educational program for older adult
learners or design a training module related in some respect to aging and older
adult learning.
II. Presentation
A.
Develop the materials in whatever style or fashion that works for you.
You might use narrative with footnoting, general discussion, step-wise
discussion (1, 2, etc.), fictional narrative, etc., depending on what choice
you make.
B.
Prepare a 5-25 page (or more) typed or word processed (double-spaced)
report of your discussion and information unless some other type of product
makes more sense.
C. Share your information with a colleague and
ask for feedback on your work.
III. Educational Goals
A.
To facilitate your carrying out some in-depth study, acquisition, and
comprehension of knowledge related to some course content area.
B. To enhance your analytical skills in
comparing, contrasting, and critically reflecting on various sources of
information.
IV. Miscellaneous
A.
Consider selecting a person, topic, or agency related to the educational
gerontology with whom or which you are not familiar as it will make it more
meaningful.
B.
Discussing what you develop with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
TERM PROJECT
SUPPLEMENT P - THE INTERACTIVE READING LOG
The interactive reading
log is an assignment designed to give you a thoughtful exposure to a broad area
of subject matter. It is intended to place relatively greater stress on reading
and less stress on intensive writing related to a limited topic. A log is not
an outline and except for the suggestions given below, it is not a summary. On
the other hand, it is essentially a series of reactions to those elements in your
readings that are particularly meaningful and/or provocative.
The items selected for
reaction may include books, media, or professional journal articles. They may
be part or all of a pamphlet or book. You may skip some sections, skim others,
read others at a normal rate, or read some passages more carefully and in
depth. The spacing and number of reactions would depend on the scope of your
reading and purposes. It might involve the selection of sentences and/or longer
passages striking for their clarity, insight, stimulation, and usefulness. It
might include items which you regard ambiguous, exaggerated, poorly reasoned,
insufficiently supported, or with which you disagree. But, in essence, your
reaction calls for a comment explaining why you believe the item is
stimulating, exaggerated, useful, etc.
Also it may be related
to and combined with other ideas or illustrated by references to research and
practical experience. More specifically,
you might ask, "if this fact, point, or idea is true, then what does it
mean for other facts, points, or ideas, and/or what does it mean for
practice?" Another appropriate
question might be "can the idea be operationalized for purposes of
research?" The preceding
suggestions include a similar treatment of longer units of subject matter such
as an article, chapter, or even a whole book in which the reaction is less
itemized and more global in character.
The length and scope of
the log would vary with the type of reference selected and the intensity of
treatment given to each item. In one
case the log could consist of widely spaced reactions to a variety of
selections. In another case the log
could consist of longer reactions to fewer references carefully selected for
reading in depth. You could even write one or more book reviews (Brockett,
1985b).
In general the format
might consist of one or two paragraphs as an introduction explaining the
reasons for your choices of the subject area covered, the log of reactions
(which would constitute the bulk of the report), a two or three page
retrospective overview of the effort as a whole, and conclude with a list
of references utilized. Some people enjoy reacting to the readings by using
some color coding system, by placing personal comments in one column and direct
quotes or summaries in another column, or by "dialoguing" as if
face-to-face with the author. The idea is to read and react letting the
experience help you to grow in knowledge, to think, and to express your
thoughts as a synthesis of the reading experience. The final result is a
product that you can share with others and seek their feedback.
TERM PROJECT
SUPPLEMENT Q- PERSONALIZED/INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OR DIARY
The personalized journal
or diary is a tool to aid you in terms of personal growth, synthesis, and/or
reflection on new knowledge that is acquired. The use of a diary or journal by
adults to enhance learning is not a new phenomenon. However, it has been
confined until recently primarily to those using such an activity in
conjunction with professional writing, for religious, psychological or
meditative reasons, or for personal pleasure.
TERM PROJECT: SUPPLEMENT R
A THEORY LOG
I. Preparation
A.
The assumption serving as a basis for this activity is that you need to
"learn to think" its terminology, theory, and knowledge and to make
application to a current or proposed vocation.
B.
On your own, discover what is meant by "theory," at least in
terms that are meaningful to you.
II. Activity and Presentation
A.
Throughout your learning efforts make notes to yourself regarding what
you perceive to be theoretical concepts, salient points, truths, bridges to known
theory, ideas to be tested, gaps in the knowledge, etc.
B.
During and/or toward the end of your study efforts attempt to organize
your notes and thoughts into some cohesive format. This can be in the form of a
log, a statement, an outline, or whatever else seems appropriate in expressing
whatever grasp you have of the theory (or theory pieces) providing a foundation
for the course content, including the absence of theory, needed theory, gaps,
etc. This does not have to be a long statement unless you so desire. The
purpose is to communicate some of your conceptions regarding short-term
meeting planning and management.
C.
Share your report/log/paper/etc. with colleagues and seek their feedback.
III. Educational Goals
A.
To assist you in gaining experience in analyzing or deriving the theory
underlying a content area, i.e., the body of basic knowledge.
B.
To facilitate your obtaining experience in stating the theory, making
contributions to the theory, and determining where an understanding or
determination of theory is still needed.
IV. Miscellaneous
A.
Discussing what you develop with others can be a useful way of adding
personal knowledge by listening to critiques or suggestions and even
challenging what others say about your product.
B.
The following statements about theory may be helpful:
Theory--a
generalization or series of generalizations by which an attempt is made to
explain some phenomenon in as systematic a manner as possible.
Theory--set of assumptions
from which can be derived a set of empirical laws or principles (that can be
tested).
Theory can be used as a guide
to action, a guide to collect data, a guide to new knowledge, or a guide to
explain.
Theory is not a philosophy, a
taxonomy, a dream, or something personal.
You don't prove a theory--you
build a theory by empirically testing a variety of related assumptions (expand,
clarify, build).
[FOLLOWING ARE
SOME SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS]
THEORY OF MARGIN
Another useful tool for understanding the dynamics
of adulthood is offered by Howard McClusky (1974) in his theory of
Power-Load-Margin. According to McClusky, the key factors of adult life are the
load the adult carries in living, and the power which is available to him or
her to carry the load. Margin is the ratio between load and power. It is the
power available to a person over and beyond that required to handle any
personal load. By load we mean the demands made on a person by self and
society. By power we mean the resources such as abilities, possessions,
positions, or allies which a person can call upon in coping with load. More
explanation can be found at this web site: http://roghiemstra.com/margin.html.
AGING AND
LEARNING: AN AGENDA FOR THE FUTURE
A Paper
Presented at the International Symposium on "Learning Across the Life
Span:
Implications for
Initial and Adult Education"
[Note: A later version of this paper is a chapter in
Tuijnman and van der Kamp (1992) shown in the
workbook bibliography]
June 20-21
University of
Groningen
The Netherlands
Roger Hiemstra
Fayetteville, NY
INTRODUCTION
Good
morning! I am pleased to be here and to
share in your efforts to think through some issues related to initial through
adult education. Even though a prior
commitment prevents me from staying for the entire symposium, I would be
pleased to assist in whatever way I can in the future as this is a topic in
which I am very interested. I will be
teaching at the University of Twente in Enschede
April, May, and June of 1992 so will be more accessible during that time period
to colleagues in Holland. At any rate,
you can use the information on the front cover of this presentation to contact me.
I was
asked to look specifically at the topic "Aging and Learning" and I
have added as a sub-heading, "An Agenda for the Future," with the
intent of providing some ideas or models that may be useful in the future
development of related policy, programs, and research for the Netherlands. I think it is very appropriate to begin this
symposium with the aged, because they are an underserved and untapped
potential.
Actually,
those of you attending this symposium most likely are aware of the growth in numbers
of elderly participating in learning activities. I certainly know this growth has taken and
continues to take place in the United States and anticipate it is true here,
too, or it will be in the future.
Coinciding with this growth has been an increasing amount of research on
older adults as learners. Just as an
example, Adult Education Quarterly, Adult
Learner, Educational Gerontology, the Gerontologist, the International Journal
of Aging and Human Behavior, and the Journal
of Gerontology are some of the US journals that regularly report on such
research.
This
research has focused on various areas.
Some has been on physiological problems adults face as they age, such as
various visual or hearing losses and the impact this has on learning. For example, Williams (1990) reported that
recent epidemiological studies of several aging populations revealed
interesting differences in the effects of visual versus hearing deficits on
such functions as memory. People with
declines in vision are more likely to have difficulty in remembering recently
acquired information. Hearing loss
appears closely associated with long-term memory and visual perception more
closely associated with short-term memory.
Researchers
also have studied how information is processed, short and long-term memory,
intelligence measures, motivation, and life stages. Sternberg (1985, 1986, 1991; Sternberg &
Wagner, 1986), for example, talks about intelligence in terms of what he calls
a triarchic theory and selective combination or comparisons
that people make. He suggests that there
is more to intelligence, whether it is adult intelligence or practical
intelligence, than can be measured by standard IQ tests. He believes there is an external or social
aspect of intelligent behavior where people can learn to adapt or shape their
world. Another aspect is what he calls
experiential or the role experience can play through a person's ability to cope
with novelty or to automate familiar tasks.
Another aspect is tied to the more common internal or mental processes
of planning, encoding, and problem solving.
Sternberg has created much interest in rethinking what is known about
intelligence. Much research is needed to
understand his work in terms of older learners, but the value of experience
alone in older people make such research vitally important.
Other
research areas have included cognitive styles, learning to learn, learning
needs and activities of older people, and life satisfaction. For example, Kolodny
(1991) describes the importance of understanding learners' cognitive styles for
teaching success. Three of my students
have completed dissertations related to the life satisfaction of older adult
learners finding the anticipated positive correlations between active learning
and life satisfaction measures (Brockett, 1982; Estrin, 1985; Henry,
1989). Many people at this symposium no
doubt will discuss several of these topics in more detail.
In
the few minutes that I have, I'll briefly describe three programs developed for
older learners that might serve as models for future development in the
Netherlands. I'll also talk about my own
research on adult learning and instruction during the past 15 years and
summarize some instructional implications I have gleaned from either my
research or the literature. Finally,
I'll suggest some future policy ideas that could be considered during and after
this symposium.
OLDER ADULTS AS
LEARNERS
One
thing that is quite clear is that individual differences among the aged do
exist. Older adults, especially if being
considered as learners, cannot be treated or viewed as a single group. The elderly are heterogeneous,
multi-dimensional in characteristics, and varied in terms of needs and
abilities. For example, several
researchers and program developers have shown how successful older adults can
be in educational pursuits. Fisher
(1986), Galbraith and James (1984), and Peterson (1983) are only a few doing
such work in the US. In my own research
(Hiemstra, 1975, 1976) I have found that most adults in the 65-75 year old
range will spend 325 hours or more each year engaged in what a Canadian
research, Allen Tough, calls learning projects (Tough, 1971, 1979). In a longitudinal study I have had underway
since 1975 (Hiemstra, 1982), I have determined that many adults keep involved
with learning activities into their 80's and 90's.
One
viable example of such active involvement in the US is the Elderhostel
movement. Initiated in 1974 by Marty Knowlton
in the New England area (Knowlton, 1977), Elderhostel is a confederation of
provider institutions, mainly colleges and universities, that sponsors programs
for people over 60. These programs are
patterned after the youth hostels and folk schools found in many parts of
Europe and Scandinavia. As Kinney (1989)
points out, 165,000 older learners participate in programs throughout the US
and 38 foreign countries in 1988. Those
numbers continue to increase. In my
hometown, LeMoyne College, a private liberal arts college in a Jesuit
tradition, hosts over 500 people each year in 30 to 40 different groups. These groups participate in about 20
week-long programs over such topics as the Decades of the 30's, 40's, and 50's,
the history of New York's old canal system (the Erie Canal), and famous women
throughout history. Perhaps you have
Elderhostel or similar programs in Holland.
If not, it would be a viable model you could study for future program
development purposes.
Another
example is SeniorNet, a service that comes from San
Francisco, California. SeniorNet provides an electronic community for people 55 or
older having an interest in obtaining computer skills. SeniorNet
involvement (it costs $25 per year plus phone charges) provides members with computer-related
literature, a newsletter, an annual conference, and a national electronic
network over the Delphi system for electronic mail, electronic conferences, and
access to various data bases. SeniorNet has several thousand members in nearly 50 cities
around the US. In a recent survey of
1400 members, it was found that they used computers for various activities
ranked in the following way: Word
processing, personal finances management, tele-communications, business,
hobbies, and miscellaneous (Why We Use Computers, 1990).
Syracuse
University through the Graduate Program of Adult Education currently is one of
the member sites. We provide a campus
location with several computers to older people who wish to gather to talk
about computers, use them for various purposes, and use SeniorNet. We also administer a project where we use the
education of older adults in direct relation to initial education, a need
suggested by Max van der Kamp in the concept paper he developed for this
symposium (van der Kamp, 1991). This
project, entitled "Computers and the Elderly," involves training
older people in various aspects of computer literacy. They in turn volunteer in the Syracuse Public
Schools to introduce first and second graders to word processing and teach
fifth graders language arts through computers (Hiemstra, 1987).
My
own research during the past five years has begun to focus on some practical
implications related to this heavy involvement of adults in learning,
especially older adults as I noted earlier.
Much of it is related to learning how to learn, one of the scientific
viewpoints Max van der Kamp wants discussed and considered at this
symposium. For example, I have developed
some procedures for helping practitioners teach older adults (Hiemstra,
1980). A colleague, Burton Sisco, and I
also have been working on some new approaches for teaching adults and have
developed various corresponding instructional procedures that have potential
for your consideration during and after the symposium (Hiemstra & Sisco,
1990). We believe that what we call an
individualizing instructional process has potential for adult learners. Based on considerable research on the
self-directed learning activities of adults (Brockett & Hiemstra, 1991),
and building on Sternberg and others' notions about practical intelligence and
the role of experience, the six-step individualizing process we developed
includes the following: Step one --
planning activities prior to the first meeting with learners; two -- creating a
positive learning environment; three -- developing the instructional plan; four
-- identifying appropriate learning activities; five -- monitoring the progress
of learners; six -- evaluating individual learner outcome. The process enables learners to assume considerable
responsibility for their own learning.
There
also are various obstacles faced by older adults you should consider in your
future policy and program development efforts, regardless of the instructional
process being used. Although some
problems specific to a location or economic group will exist, typical obstacles
include inadequate transportation, time limitations, high costs, low
self-esteem or self-confidence, stereotypes regarding the elderly and
education, and lack of knowledge about various learning opportunities. Health-related limitations and overall health
status also can impact on learning ability and activity, such as fatigue,
reduced mobility, and declining hearing or visual acuity.
The
instructor's role also is important in terms of the speed used to present
information to older learners. This
means allowing for adequate response time, using recognition rather than recall
techniques, providing adequate feedback on learner progress, and employing self
or peer-evaluation techniques.
Another
related area of study I have concentrated on during the past decade pertains to
building effective learning environments (Hiemstra, 1991). I define a learning environment as all of the
physical surroundings, psychological or emotional conditions, and social or
cultural influences affecting the growth and development of an adult engaged in
an educational enterprise. This entails
paying attention to the physical spaces in which learning takes place. It involves understanding issues like the
emotional baggage an adult learner might bring to the learning setting. It necessitates that educators and trainers
be conscious of various social or cultural impediments that might affect
learning activities.
For
example, as a male my awareness of several limitation in my own teaching
approaches was heightened when I began to read some of the literature related
to what in the US has become known as "women's ways of knowing." Personally I have begun to incorporate more
information and approaches that speak to what this aspect of the learning
environment has begun to teach me.
Racism, whether overt, subtle, or unconscious is another area that needs
to be confronted by those of us setting policy and developing programs (Colin
& Preciphs, 1991). One thing that I have determined from the
kind of research I have reported, and not too surprising to you I'm sure, is
that so much more needs to be learned.
SOME POLICY
IMPLICATIONS
I
know that Max and Willem hope that some future policies associated with initial
and adult education will result from this symposium's activities. The development of policy applicable for any
age learner, interested educators, and educational, community, or governmental
agencies is a difficult and complicated activity. It requires accumulating considerable
knowledge about learners. It also
necessitates recognizing the complex nature of most human or societal
problems. The application of personal
and institutional philosophies to building policies also can be a crucial
step. Finally, incorporating policy
recommendations into practice activities requires much care, dedication, and
patience.
I
have developed a group of policy statements initially in concert with some
adult education colleagues and later refined as I carried out some of the additional
research reported in this paper. I
define a policy as a recommended course of action for achieving some goal or
meeting some need, such as creating new educational services for older
learners. Further, I believe the purpose
of a policy is to serve as a framework for decision-making rather than as a
dogmatic rule or administrative directive.
In the case of this symposium, policy suggestions may help set an agenda
for the future.
Policy Area |
Policy Recommendation |
Implementation Strategies |
Older adults as learners |
Encourage older learners to examine personal
strengths and weaknesses |
Assist older adults to complete self-inventories
or self-concept measures |
Adult education organizations |
Organizations working with older learners should
provide learning environments that accommodate learning |
Examine the learning environment in terms of
physical, emotional, and social issues; make any needed changes |
Although the policies have been written with the
adult rather than initial learner in mind, I share them with you in the hope
they will be useful as you and your colleagues shape some future policies for
the Netherlands.
I
look forward to engaging in some dialogue with any of you regarding some of the
ideas I have shared today.
References
Brockett,
R. G. (1982). Self-directed learning
readiness and life satisfaction among older adults. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Brockett,
R. G. & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning:
Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
Colin,
S. A. J. III & Preciphs, T. K. (1991). Perceptual patterns and the
learning environment: Confronting White racism. In R. Hiemstra (Ed.), Creating environments for effective adult
learning (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, Number 50).
San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Estrin,
H. R. (1985). Life satisfaction and
participation in learning activities among widows. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Fisher,
J. C. (1986). Participation in educational activities by active older adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 202-210.
Galbraith,
M. W. & James, W. B. (1984). Assessment of dominant perceptual learning
styles of older adults. Educational
Gerontology, 10, 449-458.
Henry,
N. J. (1989). A qualitative study about
perceptions of lifestyle and life satisfaction among older adults.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Hiemstra,
R. (1975). The older adult and learning.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 117 371).
Hiemstra,
R. (1976). The older adult's
learning projects. Educational
Gerontology, 1, 331‑341.
Hiemstra,
R. (1980). Preparing human service
practitioners to teach older adults (Information Series No. 209).
Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, ERIC Clearinghouse for Adult, Career, and
Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 193 529).
Hiemstra,
R. (1982). The elderly learner: A naturalistic inquiry. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Adult Education Research Conference
(pp. 103-107). Adult and Continuing Education, University of Nebraska, Lincoln,
Nebraska.
Hiemstra,
R. (1987). Older people master personal computer use. Perspectives on Aging, 16(1), 19.
Hiemstra,
R. (Ed.). (1991). Creating environments for effective
adult learning (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,
Number 50). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hiemstra,
R. & Sisco, B. (1990). Individualizing instruction: Making
learning personal, empowering, and successful. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, Publishers.
Kinney,
M. B. (1989). Elderhostel: Can it work at your institution? Adult Learning, 1(3), 21-24.
Knowlton,
M. P. (1977). Liberal arts: The Elderhostel plan for survival. Educational Gerontology, 2, 87‑94.
Kolodny, A. (1991, February 6). Colleges must recognize
students' cognitive styles and cultural backgrounds. Chronicle of Higher Education, A44.
Peterson,
D. A. (1983). Facilitating education for
older learners. San Francisco: Jossey‑Bass.
Sternberg,
R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg,
R. J. (1986). Intelligence applied:
Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills. Orlando, Fl: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Sternberg,
R. J. (1991). Understanding adult intelligence. Adult Learning, 2(6), 8-10.
Sternberg,
R. H., & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.). (1986). Practical
intelligence: Nature and origin of competence. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Tough,
A. (1971). The adult's learning projects.
Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Tough,
A. M. (1979). The adult's learning
projects (2nd ed.). Austin, Texas: Learning Concepts.
van
der Kamp, M. (1991). Learning across the
life span: Implications for initial and adult education. A concept paper
developed for an international symposium with the same title, University of
Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Why
we use computers. (1990). Seniornet Newsline, Fall, 4.
Williams,
T. F. (1990, June). Research needs in aging and vision (A supplement to the
following periodical). NCVA Aging &
Vision News, 3(1), 1-2.
OLDER WOMEN'S
WAYS OF LEARNING:
TAPPING THE FULL
POTENTIAL
This
is a paper developed for a conference on working with older adult women. It can
be found at the following web site: http:/roghiemstra.com/unospeech.html
FOUR CASE
REPORTS
(Note: The names used are pseudonyms for purposes of
confidentiality, although I have attempted to maintain the "flavor"
of each name)
Mr. George Washington Brown
A man
of medium height and slight build, Mr. Brown is 99 years of age. He lives in the extended care wing of a large
nursing home in a medium sized mid-western town. Born of Midwest farm pioneers in April of
1882, Mr. Brown was the first of seven children. His mother spent some time as a country
school teacher and his father stayed involved with the livestock business most
of his life. Until he was 19, Mr. Brown
was never more than 20 miles from home.
A
love of farming sent him to a land-grant university for a degree in
agriculture. While an undergraduate, Mr.
Brown helped conduct corn research and carries on such interests today. The Cooperative Extension Service came into
being in one state about the time Mr. Brown was graduating and he became one of
the first Extension agents there. Among
one of the most exciting chapters in Mr. Brown's life was involvement with the
famous "corn train" adult education experiments sponsored by
Extension, where trains traveled around the state with cars converted to
educational labs and classrooms so farmers could receive instruction at each
stop. Married in 1908, he and his wife
had five children. All are still living,
as are some 18 grandchildren and 20 great-grandchildren.
When
I first interviewed Mr. Brown in 1975, he got around only with the use of a
walker (a stroke a few years earlier had left some permanent mobility
limitations). The lack of mobility did
not affect a very active mind, however.
A laboratory effect was in place in his nursing home room, with corn
samples in abundance, a variety of farm records and other charts neatly
arranged in piles, and an obviously often used electric typewriter the center
of attention. He reported that he still
obtained corn samples from colleagues in several states or in Mexico. He was actively pursuing work on two books
and wondering what to do with all the photographs of farm buildings he had
collected on a journey throughout the United States after his retirement.
When
I asked him about his apparent involvement and success with lifelong learning,
he had several observations. He noted
that he had received lots of encouragement from home to do reading and to go on
to college (his mother had graduated from college and his father had completed
some high school). Mr. Brown also
believed he had more "stick-to-itiveness" than the average person and
also perceived of himself as a forward looking person. He also noted that necessity was the mother
of invention and that he had on many occasions used that motto to keep himself
going on some tough research problem or learning activity.
Mrs. Louse Mae Wilson
Mrs.
Wilson is a woman of medium height and quite slender. She is 84 years of age. She appeared very alert on my first contact with
her in 1975. Her home was very tidy,
several books were in evidence, and lots of beautiful art work hung on the
walls. Mrs. Wilson also was very
interested in my research and had prepared several pages of notes, apparently
based on the few preliminary comments about the research that I had mentioned
on the phone. She also asked me lots of
questions. Thus, our first visit
consumed some three hours. My two
subsequent visits with here were not much shorter and mail or phone
conversations always have been most interesting.
Born
of pioneer stock in a small Midwestern town, she was the oldest of three
children. Her mother had 11 years of
high school plus some normal school training; she taught school in a rural
community for awhile and during her many years as a
homemaker was involved in a variety of part-time money making projects. Mrs. Wilson's father also had 11 years of
high school and worked as a carpenter and in a flour mill. Mrs. Wilson and her husband had four
children, all of whom were well educated.
Mrs.
Wilson graduated from a teachers college and taught high school for 23
years. Even during her 20 years
primarily as a homemaker, she worked part-time with a school lunch
program. She was involved in a variety
of organizations and activities when I first met her in 1975. She had been to Europe four times between
1970 and 1975. Mrs. Wilson also was then
and has since been involved in various writing activities. She has published two books of free
verse. Here is a sample:
Creatively Productive
To be creatively
productive
From year to
year
Is an
achievement to be desired.
One has to work
at it.
Perhaps the
first step
Is to look for
hidden talents
And to realize
that tasks of any kind
Can be creative
if done with a loving heart.
Patience, father
persistence
Will bring their
own reward
If we refuse to
sit with folded hands.
That
philosophy so epitomizes Mrs. Wilson's outlook on life. In a recent communication, she said about the
activity of writing: "In my
opinion, writing could well be used more widely as an interesting hobby for
those in the 'last quarter.' Starting
with family stories youth love to hear, it doesn't require unusual talent--just
an interest." She also noted,
"At 84 I'm 'slowed down' by failing health but would still affirm what I
said in 1975, I still believe one should maintain contacts in many fields in so
far as opportunity presents.
When
I asked her about some ideas regarding her successful learning activities, she
noted that you need to keep active and take advantage of opportunities as they
arise. "You have to prepare for old
age early on." She also noted that
she finds pride in all that she does.
Mr. Edward Bode
Mr.
Bode, age 82, was born in 1900 in a western state, the second of seven children. All seven children (all boys) obtained either
masters or doctoral degrees. His father
was a minister, had a masters degree (divinity
school), and was a good influence on his children although he pushed them to
their limits. His mother was a college graduate,
too, and he remembers her as having the most overall influence on the children
through reading to them and quietly encouraging them toward success.
The
holder of a masters degree, Mr. Bode taught school
for four years. He then served as a
public school administrator for some twenty years and as a personnel director
for twenty years. A Red Cross volunteer
for nearly 50 years, Mr. Bode also has done volunteer work for the Veteran's
Administration, vocational rehabilitation, and the United Fund. He also served as a program host on
Educational Television for a period. He
has an enthusiastic feeling for others and this shows in all that he does: "I love people."
Although
he has had two massive heart attacks in his life, he has amazing energy and vitality. He does a variety of exercises and lots
walking daily. He proudly communicated
to me a recent accomplishment, the publishing of his biography. He also does some free verse:
The world
doesn't know you, so
The world
doesn't care.
I am the one who
knows you.
Your
burdens I gladly share.
Lay
them on me!
When
I asked him to suggest some of the reasons for his success in life and as an
active person, he suggested that because his parents were involved in many
activities, they encouraged activity in their children. He also noted recently, "Because of my
home life as a youth and the training and examples set for me, I probably have
a greater feeling for others than most of my peers.
Dr. Felicia Lohrman
At
102 years of age, Dr. Lohrman is the oldest resident
of a nursing home in a large Midwestern city.
Born in a state in the northeastern part of the country, her family was
at one time involved in the underground railroad movement. She was the second of five children. Her parents were both high school graduates
and also attended some schooling beyond that.
Her parents owned and operated a farm.
She never married.
Dr. Lohrman obtained a Ph.D. in educational research and served
primarily as a researcher and educational consultant much of her working
life. She also was a college professor,
worked with the social placement of children and in foster home work. In 1975, although at that time in a nursing
home and with very little mobility, she spent an unusually large amount of time
each day reading. Declining health and
energy since then has reduced such activity but she still does some reading,
has others read to her, and participates in discussion activities almost every
week. Dr. Lohrman
has written several professional articles in her lifetime and did considerable
traveling before her mobility became limited.
When
we talked about her involvement and success as a learner, she suggested that
inherited genes, continuing interest and responsibility, a curious mind, and a
strong desire for education were important factors. In a recent communication, she noted: "I think of education as a life process
unless a person is senile." She
added, "I have come to respect the learning of every intelligent person
and am sorry for those evidently lacking an active mind." She concluded with, "I firmly believe
that mental and physical strength should be generally conserved. Pathetic is my word for the person of any age
who has lost contact with reality."
Dear Diary: A Learning Tool for Adults
By
Rachel S. Christensen
Lifelong Learning: The Adult Years, 5(2), 1981, 4-5, 31
(Printed
here by permission of the senior editor)
The adult learner is here to stay. We know from
studies exploring the extent of adult learning what a high percentage of
adults are actively involved in learning projects. Observers of these learners
are recommending that tools be developed to assist lifelong learners in
accomplishing learning tasks more effectively.
A particular tool, which has been serving adult learners for
centuries, yet about which little is known, is the diary or personal journal.
Its most familiar form is as a chronological record of personal or historical
events. It is also commonly used as a trip or project log. However, another
form of journal recording has emerged in this introspective 20th century in
which the content emphasizes one's feelings and reflections on an event,
rather than stressing the factual information. It is this approach that can
have relevance for lifelong learners.
The Interest in Diaries and Journals
The writing of diaries and journals has been frequently practiced by
those involved in a religious life or in the creative arts. We can also turn to
such pioneers of modern psychology as Freud, Jung, and Adler to learn from them
the significance in recording one's dreams, fantasies, inner thoughts, and
feelings. In recognizing the subconscious as an influence in human
development, they opened a door for new exploration of personality.
Journal researcher, Tristine Rainer (1978),
identifies four pioneers of psychology and literature in this century who
helped conceptualize the principles of modern journal writing: Carl Jung,
Marion Milner, Ira Progoff, and Anais Nin. These
writers and thinkers believed that the personal journal permits the writer to
tap valuable inner resources by recording dreams, inner imagery, intuitive
writing, and even drawings.
There have been an increasing number of seminars and workshops available
to adult learners on journal writing. What is it that is being described? It
is, as Rainer titles her book, The New Diary. In other words, it is something beyond the popular notion of
diary as a chronological entry of events usually made on a daily basis. In this
newer form there are no rules of composition. The content, structure, and
style are up to the writer. No one will judge or grade this paper and the degree
of sharing and privacy is left in the writer's hands. As Rainer (1978) states,
"For some people learning to be free in their diaries is a way of learning
to be free with themselves." This may explain the current interest in
journal writing. The experience of journal keeping frees people to explore and
develop their potentials and abilities. These are goals which have been
strongly encouraged by the human potential movement and which have foundations
in the current interest in self-directed adult learning.
Finding the
Inner Self
As we assess the needs of lifelong learners, the journa1 or diary
should be considered as a resource which encourages and enhances self-reliance
and self-awareness. It is in the solitude of blank pages that adults can
reflect on their life experience, contemplate future directions, and come to
trust more deeply their own answers.
Finding the inner self is not an easy task when the modern fast-paced
culture provides little space for contemplation. Like the Mad Hatter in Alice
in Wonderland, we're often in too great a hurry to listen to our inner wisdom.
Encouraged by the values of a technological age, we try to produce more at a
faster rate. So too in education, where some say, "How can we help adults
learn more and how can they learn faster?" Yet isn't there a sacrifice
made when you travel by superhighway and miss the beauty of country roads?
Thus, the journal is one means for providing a
safeguard against this tendency in our culture. The outer-directed emphasis in
our lives can be countered with an emphasis on inner direction by taking time
to write and reflect in the journal. As we become better listeners to the inner
movement of ourselves, we become less dependent on external definition or
advice from the experts, and more affirming of our unique resources and
abilities.
Much of our creativity is seeded in unconscious parts of the
personality. It is in moments of solitude that insights are able to float to
our consciousness and be recognized. In his book The Courage to Create, Rollo
May (1975) writes of the hesitancy people have in being quiet and alone long
enough to listen to inner levels. They are wary of what might be heard. Yet,
May finds a "fascinating relationship" between creativity and
unconscious phenomena. It is in those moments away from rational thinking that
the intuitive self can break through with creative insight. Unconscious
dimensions of experience are always at work; still there is reluctance to
pause and listen to the messages. If creativity can be tapped from the deeper
levels within, then adult learners need to be introduced to ways of using the
journal as a means of recording these connections.
Using Journal
Writing
It seemed like going
steady was a fad in the winter of ‘59. Everyone was attached except me.
Sometimes I'd wish to be able to go steady with someone, but it would soon
pass. Someday I'll find my man; he won't be perfect, but he'll be what I want.
If I don't find him, who cares? I will be a rich old maid English teacher.
My interest in journal keeping was not revived until 10 years later when
I began a career transition. The approach I took then was to use the pages of
a spiral bound notebook as space to develop a "roadmap" for myself
during that time of ambiguity and uncertainty about my future direction. The
journal served as a place for me to organize my learning activities between
jobs and to evaluate what had been accomplished at particular intervals.
As I became more comfortable in writing these objective entries,
self-consciousness waned and there appeared to be more description of feelings
and personal reactions to people and events in my life. The realization that my
journal would not be open to outside scrutiny also lowered inhibitions.
Entries were not made frequently, but often enough to benefit my personal
growth. Following are more recent entries from my journal:
(Portion of a letter to friend, 1971)
This is the first time
I've had so much unstructured time that it is somewhat frightening; because it
is I that must take responsibility for structuring my time and not some outside
factor, i.e. school. Needless to say, it is exciting to begin to shape some
creative form in the open "canvas" of time that I call mine this
year.
(excerpt from 1973)
God, this has been a depressing
year at times. Fortunately the waves have gone up as well as down, so my
strength and sense of self returns once again with courage. But it seems my
lows have been deeper than I've ever known. Yet I think in coming so directly
in contact with my fears, I come out with more courage. I wish my identity and
life would hurry up and take more form.
(excerpt from 1974)
Looking through this
journal for a few minutes each morning is a way of reminding me of my Self–my
soul, my ref1ective, creative part–in the midst of tasks, errands, chores. To
keep in touch with Me a bit each day keeps creative energies growing.
Understanding the variety of ways to maintain journals has expanded
with each new resource I discover –friends who utilize particular techniques or
those who have organized a framework for teaching and encouraging others in the
practice of journal work.
The most thorough and concise framework has been developed by Ira Progoff, a psychologist and founder of Dialogue House in
New York City. His perspective on the human personality is influenced by C. J.
Jung with whom he studied in Europe. His approach to journal work is based on
10 years spent as Director of the Institute for Research in Depth Psychology at
the Graduate School of Drew University, where he and his staff collected the
life histories of a wide spectrum of persons in order to study adult
development. He also drew upon his experience and experimentation with the use
of journals, both for himself and in his therapeutic practice.
Having tested, expanded, and refined this framework in hundreds of
journal workshops, Progoff's Intensive Journal method
allows people to start wherever they are and begin to bring focus and clarity
to their lives. He describes it as "a method of working privately at the
inner levels of our life" (Progoff, 1975). The
method is referred to as the Intensive Journal in that it is not simply a
passive record of events, but rather an active system of dialogue and feedback
among the various sections.
Progoff is
critical of the spontaneous method of journal work, the danger being that a
person could keep "eloquently moving in circles" forever if the
contents are not used in such a way as to bring new self-understanding and
forward momentum. He also finds a journal can be limiting when it is used only
to reach a pre-decided goal, in that it is "not related to the large
development of life as a whole." When an individual's attitudes are
fixed and inflexible, and the goals already chosen, a journal then becomes a
"static tool . . . not an instrument of growth but of self-justification"
(Progoff, 1975).
It is important to Progoff that this tool be
as free as possible from imposition of others' values and that it be used by
the learner without assistance from any outside authority, once the method is
understood. Diarists must be able to dialogue among the journal sections with
only themselves as guides.
Tristine
Rainer, mentioned earlier, is less critical of spontaneous entries. She sees
the diary as a place for the intuitive and rational to form creative fusion.
She has discovered among all the journals she has collected and read
some techniques and modes of expression utilized by the diarists. Many examples
are included in her book (Rainer, 1978), illustrating such tools as guided
imagery, dialogue, a list, the unsent letter, a map of consciousness. An
entire chapter is devoted to dreamwork and what it can tell us about ourselves
and our future directions. Rainer points out that re-reading past journal
entries can illuminate patterns of development and give us important clues to
our interests and desires.
She is especially helpful in identifying common blocks in beginning
to write and suggests ways of dealing with them. The judgment we bring to our
writing is an important inhibitor. She emphasizes that the diary is no place to
be perfect. The less shy we can be about writing our true feelings, the more
intimate we can be with ourselves. Which will remove another inhibitor–the
fear that what we say on paper will be boring. Over time the diarist will
reveal his or her natural writing style and will allow a natural voice to be
heard in the contents.
Rainer encourages diarists to use what they already have–their own
experience–and get at this in whatever way is easiest. As more is learned about
the continued developmental growth of adults, the journal becomes an excellent
means for adults to observe and better understand the stages of their own adult
development.
Implications for Adult Education
Gross considers the learning log or diary as the most important tool
for the learner, especially the learner who perceives his or her learning as
lifelong and chooses to pursue learning in varied ways. The journal can be
started with whatever is of most interest to the learner at the time–planning
career goals, understanding personal relationships, or exploring unconscious
realms of experience.
The individual's learning process becomes more apparent as experiences
related to a learning project are recorded. Idea fragments swimming around in
the head find connections on paper and grow into other new and better ideas. In
addition, the diary can be used as an evaluative tool for the learner to review
past activities and project future directions.
Although Tough doesn't write directly about a learning log, he does
describe effective lifelong learners as being self-aware, self-reliant, and
self-directed (Tough, 1971). He recommends that resources and assistance be
designed to support these qualities in all adult learners. Tough is quite
concerned that adult learners become more competent and confident in their
learning. Many of them are excessively modest about their learning as well as
weak in self-planning skills. He indicates that further study is needed to
help people develop skills at planning and conducting their own learning
projects.
The personal journal is one learning tool which can be an integral
part of this process. Its application needs to be encouraged among learners as
a means for stimulating thought and for planning and evaluating learning
projects, as well as an enrichment for one's whole life. In addition, the
journal serves to keep adults connected with a true sense of self. In a
pragmatic way, the journal never becomes obsolete; it is flexible, inexpensive,
and uses what the learner already possesses–his or her own life story.
References
Gross, Ronald. A
Handbook for The Lifelong Learner. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1977.
May, Rollo. The
Courage to Create. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1975.
Progoff, Ira. At a Journal Workshop. New York: Dialogue House
Library, 1975.
Rainer, Tristine. The
New Diary. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher, Inc.,
1978.
Tough, Allen, The
Adult's Learning Projects. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Ontario Institute
for Studies in Education, 1971.
REFERENCES, BLIOGRAPHY, AND READING SUGGESTIONS
Book Chapters,
Books, Book Reviews, and Monographs
Adams,
F. (with Horton, M.). (1975). Unearthing
seeds of fire. Winston-Salem, NC: John F. Blair.
Agruso, V. M. (1978). Learning
in later years: Principles of educational gerontology. New York: Academic Press.
Aiken,
L. R. (1989). Later life. Hillsdale,
NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Bambrough, R. (Ed.). (1963). The philosophy of Aristotle (A. E. Wardman
& J. L. Creed, Trans.). New York: New American Library of World Literature.
Bergevin, P. (1967). A
philosophy for adult education. New York: Seabury.
Brockett,
R. G. (Ed.). (1988). Ethical issues in
adult education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Brockett,
R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning:
Perspectives on theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
Brockett,
R. G., & Hiemstra, R. (2004). Toward
ethical practice. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Candy,
P. L. (1991). Self-direction in lifelong
learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Charles,
D. C. (1983). Adapting materials use to physical and psychological changes in
older learners. In J. P. Wilson (Ed.), Materials
for teaching adults: Selection, development, and use (New Directions for
Continuing Education, No. 17), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chisholm,
R. M. (1961). Realism and the background
of phenomenology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Coni,
N. (1984). Ageing: The facts. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Courtenay,
B. (1990). Community education for older adults. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Education through community organizations
(New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 47), San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Cushman,
R. E. (1958). Therapeia: Plato's conception of philosophy.
Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Dewey,
J. (1938). Experience and education.
New York: Macmillan.
Elias,
J. L., & Merriam, S. (1980). Philosophical
foundations of adult education. Huntington, NY: Robert E. Krieger Publishing
Company.
Fischer,
D. H. (1978). Growing old in America
(Expanded Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foner, A. (1986). Aging
and old age: New perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Freire,
P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.
New York: Herder and Herder.
Glendenning,
F. (Ed.). (1985). Educational
gerontology, international perspectives. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Grabowski,
S., & Mason, W. D. (Undated). Learning
for aging. Washington, DC: Adult Education Association of the USA.
Green,
B. S. R. (1993). Gerontology and the
construction of old age: A study in discourse analysis. New York: Aldine de
Gruyter.
Gross,
R. (1977). The lifelong learner. New
York: Simon and Schuster.
Hayflick, L. (1994). How
and why we age. New York: Ballantine Books.
Hendricks, J. (1986). Aging in mass society: Myths and realities
(3rd Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Hendricks,
L. (1980). Seven steps to personal life
history writing. Woodville, FL: Author, Box 260-B, 32362.
Hess,
B. B., & Markson, E. W. (1992). Growing old in America (4th Edition).
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Hiemstra,
R. (1975). The older adult and learning.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 117 371).
Hiemstra,
R. (1980). Preparing human service
practitioners to teach older adults (Information Series No. 209). Columbus,
Ohio. Ohio State University, ERIC Clearinghouse for Adult, Career, and Vocational
Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 193 529).
Hiemstra,
R. (1985). The older adult's learning projects. In D. B. Lumsden
(Ed.), The older adult as learner.
Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing. Hiemstra, R. (1988). Translating personal values and philosophy into
practical action. In R. G. Brockett (Ed.), Ethical issues in adult education
(pp. 178-194). New York: Teachers College Press. Available electronically: http://roghiemstra.com/philchap.html
Hiemstra,
R. (1990). Self-directed learning for older adults. In American Association for
Retired Persons (Staff Editors), Resourceful
aging: Today and tomorrow (Conference Proceedings, Volume V: Lifelong
Education). Washington, DC: AARP.
Hiemstra,
R. (Ed.). (1991). Creative environments for effective
adult learning (New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,
Number 50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hiemstra,
R. (1993). Three underdeveloped models for adult learning. In S. Merriam (Ed.),
An update on adult learning theory
(New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 57), San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Hiemstra,
R. (1994). Lifelong education and personal growth. In A. Monk (Ed.), The Columbia retirement handbook. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Hiemstra,
R. (2013). Facilitating adult self-directed learning. In R. Hiemstra & P.
Carré (Eds.), A feast of learning:
International perspectives on adult learning and change (pp.
25-46).Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Hiemstra,
R., & Brockett, R. G. (1994). From behaviorism to humanism: Incorporating
self-direction in learning concepts into the instructional design process. In
Long, H. B. & Associates, New ideas
about self-directed learning. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for
Continuing Professional and Higher Education, University of Oklahoma
Hiemstra,
R., & Sisco, B. (1990). Individualizing instruction: Making
learning personal, powerful, and successful. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass. [Also see "Guiding Older Adult Learners," pp. 223-228,
which summarizes some research related to educating older adults.]
Hutchins,
R. M. (1968). The learning society.
New York: Frederick A. Praeger.
Illich, I. (1970). Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row.
Jecker, N. S. (1991). Aging
and ethics: Philosophical problems in gerontology. Clifton, NJ: Humana
Press.
Kimmel,
D. C. (1990). Adulthood and aging:
Interdisciplinary developmental view (3rd Edition). New York: John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
Knowles,
M. (1975). Self-directed learning.
Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.
Knowles,
M. S. (1980). The modern practice of
adult education (revised and updated). Chicago: Follett Publishing Company.
Knowles,
M. S. (1986). Using learning contracts.
San Francisco: Jossey‑Bass.
Knowles,
M. S., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy
in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Larue,
G. A. (1992). Geroethics: A new vision of growing old in America.
Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Levine,
M. L. (1989). Age discrimination and the
mandatory retirement controversy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Levinson,
D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man's life.
New York: Ballantine Books.
McClusky,
H. Y. (1964). The relevance of psychology for adult education. In G. E. Jensen,
A. A. Liveright, & W. Hallenbeck
(Eds.), Adult education: Outlines of an
emerging field of university study. Washington, DC: Adult Education
Association of the USA.
McClusky,
H. Y. (ca. 1974). Education for aging: The scope of the field and perspectives
for the future. In S. Grabowski & W. D. Mason (Eds.), Learning for aging (pp. 324-355). Washington, DC: Adult Education
Association of the USA.
McKhann, G. & Albert, M. (2002). Keep
your brain young: The complete guide to physical and emotional health and
longevity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
McPherson,
B. D. (1990). Aging as a social process:
An introduction to individual and population aging (2nd Edition). Toronto:
Butterworths.
McGuire,
F. A. (1986). Computer technology and the
aged: Implications and applications for activity programs. New York:
Haworth Press.
Maslow,
A. (1976). Education and peak experience. In C. D. Schlosser (Ed.), The person in education: A humanistic approach.
New York: Macmillan.
Merriam,
S., & Lumsden, D. B. (1985). Educational needs
and interests of older learners. In D. B. Lumsden
(Ed.), The older adult as learner
(pp. 51-72). Washington, D. C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
Monk,
A. (Ed.). (1994). The Columbia retirement
handbook. New York: Columbia University Press.
Okun, M. A. (Ed.). (1982). Programs for older adults (New Directions for Continuing Education,
Number 14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peterson,
D. A. (1983). Facilitating education for
older learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peterson,
D. A. (Ed.). (1987). A national survey of
gerontology instruction in American institutions of higher education.
Washington, DC: Association for Gerontology in Higher Education.
Plopper, M. (1981). Mental health in the elderly. In R. H.
Davis (Ed.), Aging: Prospects and issues.
Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.
Post,
J. A. (1992). Gerontology and geriatrics libraries
and collections in the United States and Canada: A history, description, and
directory. New York: Greenwood Press.
Progoff, I. (1975). At
a journal workshop. New York: Dialogue House Library.
Rainer, T. (1978). The new diary. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher, Inc.
Roy,
F. H. (1992). The encyclopedia of aging
and the elderly. New York: Facts on File.
Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (1986). Adult development and aging (second
edition). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Sherman,
G. A. (Ed.). (1980). Curriculum
guidelines in minority aging. Washington, DC: National Center on Black
Aged.
Sherron, R. H., & Lumsden, D.
B. (1990). Introduction to educational
gerontology (3rd Ed.). New York: Hemisphere Publishing.
Skinner,
B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Smith,
R. M., & Associates. (1990). Learning
to learn across the lifespan. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Smith,
T. B., Mack, C., & Tittnich, E. (1993). Generations together: A job-training
curriculum for older workers in child care. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse
University Press. [Note: A series of handout masters comes with the book.]
Spicker, S. G., Woodward, K. M., & Van Tassel, D. D.
(Eds.). (1978). Aging and the elderly:
Humanistic perspectives in gerontology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities
Press.
Taylor,
A. (1926). Plato: The man and his work.
London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.
Thorndike,
E. L. (1928). Adult learning. New
York: Macmillan.
Tough,
A. (1971). The adult's learning projects.
Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (there also is a 1979
edition).
Tuijnman, A., & van der Kamp, M. (1992). Learning across the lifespan: Theories,
research, policies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Tyler,
R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum
and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.
United
States Congress House Select Committee on Aging. (1990). Education, training, and research for minorities in gerontology.
Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents.
Vaillant, G. E. (2003). Aging well:
Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study of
adult development. Boston: Little, Brown.
Waters,
E. B., & Goodman, J. (1990). Empowering
older adults: Practical strategies for counselors. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Watson,
W. H. (1982). Aging and social behavior:
An introduction to social gerontology. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth Health
Sciences Division.
Whitbourne, S. K., & Weinstock, C. S. (1979). Adult development: The differentiation of
experience. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Whitehead,
A. N. (1933). Adventure of ideas. New
York: Macmillan.
Wolf,
M. A. (1990). Older learners: Inner
reflections. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 326 744).
Wolf,
M. A. (1991). The older learner.
(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 338 870).
Wolf,
M. A. (1992). Personal development through learning in later life. In L. A.
Cavalier & A. Sgroi, (Eds.), Learning for personal development (New Directions for Adult and
Continuing Education, No. 53), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zinn,
L. (1983). Development of a valid and reliable instrument to identify a
personal philosophy of adult education. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State
University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts
International, 44, 1667A.
Journal Articles
Alpaugh, P.
K., Renner, V. J., & Birren, J. E. (1976). Age
and creativity: Implications for education and teachers. Educational Gerontology, 1, 17-40.
Arsenault, N.,
Anderson, G., & Swedburg, R. (1998).
Understanding older adults in education: Decision-making and Elderhostel. Educational Gerontology, 24, 101-114.
Babic, A. L, & Crangle, M. L.
(1987). Simulation techniques for education in gerontology: An exercise in
experiential learning. Educational
Gerontology, 13, 183-191.
Bass,
S. A. (1986). Matching educational opportunities with the able elderly. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 9(5), 4-7.
Ballester, L, Orte, C.,
March, M. X., & Oliver, J. L. (2005). The importance of socioeducational
relationships in university programs for older adult students. Educational Gerontology, 31, 253-261.
Battersby, D. (1985).
Education in later life: What does it mean? Convergence,
18, 75-81.
Blanchard-Fields,
F. (1986). Attributional processes in adult development. Educational Gerontology, 12, 291-300.
Bolton,
E. B. (1978). Cognitive and non-cognitive factors that affect learning in older
adults and their implications for instruction. Educational Gerontology, 3, 331-344.
Brady,
E. M. (1983). Personal growth and the Elderhostel experience. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 7(3), 11-13, 26.
Brady,
E. M. (1984). Demographic and educational correlates of self-reported learning
among older students. Educational
Gerontology, 10, 25-38.
Brady,
E. M. (1990). Redeemed from time: Learning through autobiography. Adult Education Quarterly, 41, 43-52.
Brockett,
R. G. (1985a). The relationship between self-directed learning readiness and
life satisfaction among older adults. Adult
Education Quarterly, 35, 194-209.
Brockett,
R. G. (1985b). Tips for the practitioner on writing book reviews. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 8(5), 29-30. Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers: Challenging
adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Brookfield, S. D. (1995) Becoming a critically
reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Catchen, H., & Lewittes, H.
(1993). Toward a framework for understanding minority gerontological
internships. Educational Gerontology, 19,
31-42.
Cattell,
R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical
experiment. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 54, 1‑22.
Cattell,
R. B. (1968). Fluid and crystallized intelligence. Psychology Today, 3, 56‑62.
Cavanaugh,
J. C., & Murphy, N. Z. (1986). Personality and metamemory
correlates of memory performance in younger and older adults. Educational Gerontology, 12, 385-394.
Chaffin, A. J. & Harlow, S. D. (2005). Cognitive learning applied to
older adult learners and technology. Educational
Gerontology, 31, 301-329.
Coon,
V. E., & Earles, J. L. (1994). Adult age
differences in long-term memory for performed activities. Journal of Gerontology, 49, 32-34.
Covey,
H. C. (1983). Higher education and older people: Some theoretical
considerations, Part I. Educational
Gerontology, 9, 95-109.
Davenport,
J. A. (1986). Learning style and its relationship to gender and age among
Elderhostel participants. Educational
Gerontology, 12, 205-218.
Day,
M., & James, J. (1984). Margin and the adult learner. MPAEA Journal of Adult Education, 13(1), 1-5.
Downs,
H. (August 21, 1994). Must we age? Parade:
The Sunday Newspaper Magazine, 4-7.
Feldman,
S., & Sweeney, S. W. (1989). Lifelong
education for lifelong needs. Adult Learning, 1(3), 14-17.
Fisher,
J. C. (1985). Liberal arts colleges and the older student. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 8(6), 6-7.
Fisher,
J. C. (1986). Participation in educational activities by active older adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 36, 202-210.
Fisher,
J. C. (1993). A framework for describing developmental change among older
adults. Adult education quarterly, 43,
76-89.
Galbraith,
M. W., & James, W. B. (1984). Assessment of dominant perceptual learning
styles of older adults. Educational
Gerontology, 10, 449-458.
Galbraith,
M. W. & Zdorkowski,
R. T. (1984). Heuristic models of elder abuse: Implications for the
practitioner. Lifelong Learning: An
Omnibus of Practice and Research, 7(8), 16-21, 24.
Glass,
J. C., Jr., & Smith, J. L. (1985). Television as an educational and
outreach medium for older adults. Educational
Gerontology, 11, 247-260.
Glendenning,
F., & Battersby, D. (1990). Educational
gerontology and education for older adults: A statement of first principles. Australian Journal of Adult and Community
Education, 30(1), 38-44.
Greenberg,
C., & Powers, S. M. (1987). Memory improvement among adult learners. Educational Gerontology, 13, 263-280.
Harvey,
R., & Jahns, I. R. (1988). Using advance
organizers to facilitate learning among older adults. Educational Gerontology, 14, 89-93.
Hausafus, C. O., Ralston, P., & DeLanoit.
(1985). Rural older adults: Participation in and perceptions of an educational
delivery system. Educational Gerontology,
11, 211-224.
Heisel, M. A. (1985). Assessment of learning activity level
in a group of Black aged. Adult Education
Quarterly, 36, 1-14.
Heisel, M. A., & Larson, G. (1984). Literacy and social
milieu: Reading behavior of the Black Elderly. Adult Education Quarterly, 34, 63-70.
Hentschel, D. & Eisen,
M. J. (2002). Developing older adults as community leaders. Adult Learning, 13(4), 12-14.
Hiemstra,
R. (1976). The older adult's
learning projects. Educational
Gerontology, 1, 331‑341.
Hiemstra,
R. (1977-78). Instrumental and expressive learning: Some comparisons. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, 161‑168.
Hiemstra,
R. (1980). Howard Yale McClusky:
Adult education pioneer and statesman. Lifelong
Learning: The Adult Years, 4(2), 5‑7, 25.
Hiemstra,
R. (1981). The contributions
of Howard Yale McClusky to an evolving discipline of educational gerontology.
Educational Gerontology, 6, 209-226.
Hiemstra,
R. (1982). Elderly interests in the
expressive domain. Educational
Gerontology, 8, 143-154.
Hiemstra,
R. (1987). Turning research on older persons into daily practice. Perspectives on Aging, 16(1), 17-19.
Hiemstra,
R. (2011). Self-directed learning: Individualizing instruction – most still do
it wrong! International Journal of
Self-Directed Learning, 8(1), 46-59. Retrieved from https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dfdeaf_b634f9f41e404b5c8a3b2746a0a3f71d.pdf.
Hiemstra, R., Essman, E.,
Henry, N., & Palumbo, D. (1987). Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative
gerontological research. Educational
Gerontology, 13, 417-426.
Hiemstra,
R. (2013). Self-Directed Learning: Why do most instructors still do it wrong? International Journal of Self-Directed
Learning, 10(1), 23-34. Retrieved from https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/dfdeaf_e996f035b2094c38a1492317121bacf1.pdf.
Hiemstra, R., Goodman, M., Middlemiss,
M. A., Vosko, R. & Ziegler, N. (1983). How older persons are portrayed in
television advertising: Implications for Educators. Educational
Gerontology, 9, 111-122.
Hole,
W. C. (1989). Up front: The older learner. Adult
Learning, 1(3), 6.
Hooper,
J. O., Hooper, F. H., Colbert, K., & McMahan, R. (1986). Cognition, memory,
and personality in elderly students. Educational
Gerontology, 12, 219-230.
Hoopes, R. (1991). You oughta be
on TV. Modern Maturity, 34(3), 48-50,
95.
Hoot,
J. L., & Hayslip, B., Jr. (1983). Microcomputers
and the elderly: New directions for self-sufficiency and life-long learning. Educational Gerontology, 9, 493-499.
Johnson,
C. J. (1986). Educational content, levels of education, and disciplines needed
for interdisciplinary gerontological education. Educational Gerontology, 12, 477-488.
Jones,
E. E. (1979). Adult education and the older adult. Educational Gerontology, 4, 349-354.
Jones,
J. E. (1980). Teaching art to the elderly: Research and practice. Educational Gerontology, 5, 17-31.
Kingston,
A. J., & Drotter, M. W. (1983). A comparison of
elderly college students in two geographically different areas. Educational Gerontology, 9, 399-403.
Kinney,
M. B. (1989). Elderhostel: Can it work at your institution? Adult Learning, 1(3), 21-24.
Klick,
A. W. (1985). Issues of widowhood: Implications for continuing education
planning. Educational Gerontology, 11,
155-160.
Knowles,
M. S. (1989). Learning after retirement. Adult
Learning, 1(3), 8-9.
Knowlton,
M. P. (1977). Liberal arts: The Elderhostel plan for survival. Educational Gerontology, 2, 87‑94.
Krause,
D. (1987). Careers in gerontology: Occupational fact or academic fancy? Gerontologist, 27(1), 30-33.
Kreitlow, B. K. (1989). Old & new: An aging America
means new learning patterns, program needs. Adult
Learning, 1(3), 7.
Kreitlow, D. J., & Kreitlow,
B. K. (1989). Careers after 60: Choices in retirement. Adult Learning, 1(3), 10-13.
Landerholm, E., & Nelson, N. J. (1985). Training
Hispanic older adults in childcare work. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 8(7), 6-8, 26.
Leclerc,
G. J. (1985). Understanding the educational needs of older adults: A new
approach. Educational Gerontology, 11,
137-144.
Long,
H. B. (1983). Academic performance, attitudes, and social relations in
intergenerational college classes. Educational
Gerontology, 9, 471-481.
Long,
H. B., & Rossing, B. E. (1979). Tuition waiver
plans for older Americans in postsecondary public education institutions. Educational Gerontology, 4, 161‑174.
McDaniel,
T. R. (1984). Educating the aging: Problems and prospects. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 7(7),
12-13, 26.
McKinlay, R. W., & Baumhover,
L. A. (Eds.). (1986). Gerontological education: Future issues and trends. Educational Gerontology, 12, entire
issue devoted to the topic.
McWhinney, W. (1990). Education for the third quarter of
life. Journal of Continuing Higher
Education, 38(2), 14-20.
Main,
K. (1979). The power-load-margin formula of Howard Y. McClusky as the basis for
a model of teaching. Adult Education, 30,
19-33.
Marcus,
E. E. (1978). Effects of age, sex, and status on perception of the utility of
educational participation. Educational
Gerontology, 3, 295-319.
Maxwell,
R. B. (1991). Education: Window to fulfillment. Modern Maturity, 34(3), 10-11.
Merriam,
S. (1977). Interviewing the aged: Some considerations for the adult educator. Adult Leadership, 25(7), 215-216).
Merriam, S. B. & Mohamad, M. (2000). How cultural values shape
learning in older adulthood: The case of Malaysia. Adult Education Quarterly, 51, 45-63.
Ogle,
S. E. (1986). Memory and aging: A review and application of current theories. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 9(6), 8-10, 27.
Okun, M. A. (1977). Implications of geropsychological
research for the instruction of older adults. Adult Education, 27, 139-155.
Okun, M. A., & DiVesta, F. J.
(1976). Cautiousness in adulthood as a function of age and instruction. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 571-576.
Okun, M. A., & Siegler, I. C.
(1977). The perception of outcome-effort covariation in younger and older men. Educational Gerontology, 2, 27-32.
Ostwald,
S. K., & Williams, H. Y. (1985). Optimizing learning in the elderly: A
model. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of
Practice and Research, 9(1), 10-15, 27.
Oyedeji, L. (1992). Education for the elderly: Coping with
learning in adult years. International
Review of Education, 38, 363-373.
Peterson,
D. A. (1986). Extent of gerontology instruction in American institutions of
higher education. Educational
Gerontology, 12, 519-529.
Peterson,
D. A., & Eden, D. Z. (1981). Cognitive style and the older learner. Educational Gerontology, 7, 57-66.
Quinlan,
R. A. (1989). Programming for mature learners. Adult Learning, 1(2), 12-14.
Ralston,
P. A. (1981). Educational needs and activities of older adults: Their
relationship to senior center programs. Educational
Gerontology, 7, 231-244.
Rodgers,
W., & Herzog, R. (1987). Interviewing older adults: The accuracy of factual
information. Journal of Gerontology, 42,
387-394.
Romaniuk, J. G. (1984). Tuition waiver policies for older
adults: What are the assumptions? Educational Gerontology, 10, 1‑11.
Schaie, K. W. (1992). The impact of methodological changes
in gerontology. International Journal of
Aging and Human Development, 35, 19-29.
Schmidt, I. W., Berg, I. J., & Deelman, B.
G. (2001). Prospective memory training in older adults. Educational Gerontology, 27, 455-478.
Shadden, B. B., & Raiford, C.
A. (1984). The communication education of older persons: Prior training and
utilization of information sources. Educational
Gerontology, 10, 83-97.
Sheppard,
N. (1983). Vocational education needs assessment of older Americans:
Methodology and some findings. Educational
Gerontology, 9, 359-376.
Stokes,
L. C., & Pankowski, M. L. (1988). Incidental
learning of aging adults. Adult Education
Quarterly, 38, 88-100.
Thorson,
J. A. (1989). She ain't heavy, she's my mother: On caring for older parents. Adult Learning, 1(3), 18-20.
Wacks, V. Q. (1989). Life after death in the Elderhostel
classroom. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus
of Practice and Research, 12(5), 23-24, 28.
Walker,
J. (1991). Older women and later life learning. Adults Learning (England), 2, 209-210.
Wass, H., & Olejnik, S. F.
(1983). An analysis and evaluation of research in cognition and learning among
older adults. Educational Gerontology, 9,
323-337.
Wendt,
P. F., & Peterson, D. A. (1993). Gerontology: A case study in the evolution
of professional education. Review of
Higher Education, 16, 181-198.
White,
G. G., & Rose, C. (1988). Empowering the older adult learner: Community
education as a delivery system. Lifelong
Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 11(7), 20-22, 30.
Willis,
S. L. (1990). Introduction to the special section on cognitive training in
later adulthood. Developmental
Psychology, 26, 875-878.
Withnall, A. (1990). Education and older adults: A
state-of-the-art review. Adults Learning
(England), 1, 255-256.
Wolf,
M. A. (1985). The experience of older learners in adult education. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 8(5), 8-11.
Wolf,
M. A. (1989). Techniques: Effective training for human service providers. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice
and Research, 12(7), 18-20.
Wolf,
M. A. (1992). Older adults & reminiscence in the classroom. Adult Learning, 3(8), 19-22.
Wolf,
M. A. (1993). Mentoring middle-aged women in the classroom. Adult Learning, 4(5), 8-9, 22.
In addition, following is a list of current and past
journals you should consider reviewing (some journals may have changed names or
be discontinued).
ABSTRACTS IN
SOCIAL GERONTOLOGY
ADULT EDUCATION
(UK)
ADULT EDUCATION
(US)
ADULT EDUCATION
QUARTERLY
ADULT LEADERSHIP
ADULT LEARNING
ADULTS LEARNING
(ENGLAND)
AGEING AND
SOCIETY
AGING
AGING &
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL REVIEW OF
GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
CANADIAN JOURNAL
ON AGING
COMPREHENSIVE
GERONTOLOGY
CONTEMPORARY
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
CONTINUING
HIGHER EDUCATION
CONTINUUM
CONVERGENCE
DEVELOPMENTAL
PSYCHOLOGY
EDUCATIONAL
GERONTOLOGY
GENERATIONS
GERONTOLOGY AND
GERIATRICS
INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF AGING AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL OF LIFELONG EDUCATION
INTERNATIONAL
REVIEW OF EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF AGING
STUDIES
JOURNAL OF AGING
& SOCIAL POLICY
JOURNAL OF
APPLIED GERONTOLOGY
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING
HIGHER EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF
CROSS-CULTURAL GERONTOLOGY
JOURNAL OF
GERONTOLOGY
LIFELONG
LEARNING: THE ADULT YEARS
LIFELONG
LEARNING: AN OMNIBUS OF PRACTICE AND RESEARCH
MODERN MATURITY
MOUNTAIN PLAINS
ADULT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION JOURNAL OF ADULT EDUCATION
NEW CHOICES FOR
RETIREMENT LIVING
NEW CHOICES FOR
THE BEST YEARS
NEW DIRECTIONS
IN CONTINUING EDUCATION
NEW DIRECTIONS
FOR ADULT AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
PERSPECTIVES IN
ADULT LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT
PERSPECTIVES ON
AGING
PHILOSOPHICAL
FOUNDATIONS OF GERONTOLOGY
STUDIES IN ADULT
EDUCATION
THE
GERONTOLOGIST
1Dr. Roger Hiemstra, Professor and
Chair Emeritus, Syracuse University, has taught courses related to adult
learning, educational gerontology, higher education, professional writing, program
planning, and self-directed learning since 1969.
December 15, 2017
Return
to the Educational Gerontology,
Gerontology, Aging-Related Information page.
Return
to the Lifelong Learning Reader
page.
Return
to the first page